Re: [Aroid-l] help for identification of a philodendron

From: "Ertelt, Jonathan B" <jonathan.ertelt at Vanderbilt.Edu> on 2013.11.23 at 01:05:17(22948) (File Type Not Recognized: attachments/131125093202-2.png) My apologies - I was not familiar with this Philodendron at the more mature stage - I was thinking that the leaf looked more like Anthurium waroqueanum, though that's from older recollections. Jonathan HTML +More From: aroid-l-bounces@gizmoworks.com [aroid-l-bounces@gizmoworks.com] on behalf of Marek Argent [abri1973@wp.pl] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 5:38 PM To: Discussion of aroids Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] help for identification of a philodendron Hello, The first one is Alocasia 'Polly', the 2nd is Philodendron melanochrysum. Ph. verrucosum looks so (note the underside of the leaves) http://araceum.abrimaal.pro-e.pl/philodendron/verrucosum.htm http://www.aroidpictures.fr/GENRES/philodendronm-z.html#verrucosum Marek ----- Original Message ----- From: Valentine Tibère To: aroid-l@www.gizmoworks.com Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 1:40 PM Subject: [Aroid-l] help for identification of a philodendron Hi I am a writer specialized in chocolate and keen on plants. I make an incursion in the flowers the most illustrated in meso-american iconography and I am trying to identify the philodendron of codex badianus. Is it a saggitifolium (alias sanguineum) despite her leaves are indented or a melanochrysum but the inflorescence is not red ? Thanks for your help and advice Valentine Tibere Valentine Tibère Tél: +336 16 49 29 14 Facebook: valentine.tibere Site: lesroutesduchocolat.com _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l --_000_73255943A0E58248872276ECE91F966469D4D680ITSHCWNEM108dsv_-- --_005_73255943A0E58248872276ECE91F966469D4D680ITSHCWNEM108dsv_

Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.