IAS on Facebook
IAS on Instagram
|
IAS Aroid Quasi Forum
About Aroid-L
This is a continuously updated archive of the Aroid-L mailing list in a forum format - not an actual Forum. If you want to post, you will still need to register for the Aroid-L mailing list and send your postings by e-mail for moderation in the normal way.
Xanthosoma
|
From: Eduardo <eggon at guarany.cpd.unb.br> on 1998.05.18 at 21:44:55(2168)
> Also, there is a BEAUTIFUL,slender and tall (4 ft.) Xanthosoma sp.
> locally, its leaves are elongately sagittate, crinkled, with
> silvery and darker stripes that are along the viens, someone
> once told me its name, but I can not bring it to mind at the moment
>
> but what I thought was Xanthosoma undipes (X. jacquinii)
Maybe Xanthosoma conspurcatum... Check on it.
Eduardo.
| |
|
From: "Julius Boos" <ju-bo at email.msn.com> on 1998.05.19 at 15:33:31(2177)
-----Original Message-----
To: ju-bo@msn.com
Date: Monday, May 18, 1998 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: Xanthosoma
Dear Eduardo,
I am not afmiliar with X. Conspurcatum, where can I find a drawing/illus. of
this plant? I believe that the plant name I forgot is X. jaquinii, which I
see here in collections from time to time.
Thanke anyway.
Sincerely,
Julius
| +More |
ju-bo@msn.com
|
|
From: plantnut at macconnect.com (Dewey Fisk) on 1999.03.27 at 02:58:13(3160)
It has been suggested that I might have the Xanthosoma atroviens
montosum... I am sorry... I do not. I will check it out and see if I can
get it...
| +More |
Deey
Dewey E. Fisk, Plant Nut
THE PHILODENDRON PHREAQUE
Your Source for Tropical Araceae
|
|
From: "Eduardo Goncalves" edggon at hotmail.com> on 2001.05.31 at 03:19:57(6634)
Dear aroiders,
I have checked the marvelous Lester?s site (see the link below) and have
found that there is a small error at the main page. The plant featured there
is Xanthosoma atrovirens, not X. violaceum. Despite the leaves really LOOK
violaceum (i.e. somewhat purplish), most of the aspect is given by the
combination of the dark green color (i.e. atro - black, virens - green) plus
the wax effect at the surface (that make it appear somewhat blue). However,
the petioles are green, and if we could see the main ribs below, they would
appear green, not purplish. Both species are usually confused there in
U.S.A., because both are usually sold with the same common names. If you
want to see a real X. violaceum, take a look at Krzysztof?s page in:
http://u1.netgate.net/~kk/Araceae/Xanthosoma/violaceum.html
Compare both pictures and you will never confuse them again.
Still on Xanthosomas, I have seen comments about the "Golden"
Xanthosoma in this list. I have seen it cultivated here in Brazil and I also
have some plants in my own collection (Xanthosoma is my favourite aroid).
The biggest individuals I have seen are cultivated at the Burle Marx
collection, and they became less golden with age. I have seen even flowering
individuals there, but I still couldn?t find out what the hell is this
plant! I am preparing an article ?bout the cultivated Xanthosoma, maybe to
be submitted to Aroideana 2002, so I HAVE to discover it someday! By now, I
think it is a form of the common X. sagittifolium, but I am not 100% sure.
In fact, I am not even 60% sure... Did someone mention 40% sure?
Best wishes,
Eduardo.
| +More |
>From: "Scott Hyndman"
>Reply-To: aroid-l@mobot.org
>To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
>Subject: Re: Yautia/Xanthasoma Sprouting
>Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:08:47 -0500 (CDT)
>
>Susan,
>
>Please take a look at Lest Kallus' and Julius Boos' information at
>http://www.kallus.com/aroids/ediblearoids.htm as this may be some of what
>you are interested in. If it is not, I am happy to help anyone develop
>such
>a Web page that you describe, and I am sure that Lester would be happy to
>add to the excellent informational and image content of his pages.
>
>Best regards, Scott
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
|
|
From: Lester Kallus lkallus at earthlink.net> on 2001.05.31 at 20:27:59(6645)
If that's the case, then my tuber was mislabeled at the grocery store
too. I had purchased Yautia lila which was more expensive than the Yautia
amarillo & Yautia blanca. Supposedly, lila is violaceum. I guess not from
what you say.
Regardless, it made a fine (and cheap) mass in the garden. I didn't,
however, bother trying to eat it at the end of the season.
Les
| +More |
At 10:19 PM 5/30/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear aroiders,
>
> I have checked the marvelous Lester?s site (see the link below) and
> have found that there is a small error at the main page. The plant
> featured there is Xanthosoma atrovirens, not X. violaceum. Despite the
> leaves really LOOK violaceum (i.e. somewhat purplish), most of the aspect
> is given by the combination of the dark green color (i.e. atro - black,
> virens - green) plus the wax effect at the surface (that make it appear
> somewhat blue). However, the petioles are green, and if we could see the
> main ribs below, they would appear green, not purplish. Both species are
> usually confused there in U.S.A., because both are usually sold with the
> same common names. If you want to see a real X. violaceum, take a look at
> Krzysztof?s page in:
>
>http://u1.netgate.net/~kk/Araceae/Xanthosoma/violaceum.html
>
>
> Compare both pictures and you will never confuse them again.
>
> Still on Xanthosomas, I have seen comments about the "Golden"
> Xanthosoma in this list. I have seen it cultivated here in Brazil and I
> also have some plants in my own collection (Xanthosoma is my favourite
> aroid). The biggest individuals I have seen are cultivated at the Burle
> Marx collection, and they became less golden with age. I have seen even
> flowering individuals there, but I still couldn?t find out what the hell
> is this plant! I am preparing an article ?bout the cultivated Xanthosoma,
> maybe to be submitted to Aroideana 2002, so I HAVE to discover it
> someday! By now, I think it is a form of the common X. sagittifolium, but
> I am not 100% sure. In fact, I am not even 60% sure... Did someone
> mention 40% sure?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Eduardo.
>
>
>>From: "Scott Hyndman"
>>Reply-To: aroid-l@mobot.org
>>To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
>>Subject: Re: Yautia/Xanthasoma Sprouting
>>Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:08:47 -0500 (CDT)
>>
>>Susan,
>>
>>Please take a look at Lest Kallus' and Julius Boos' information at
>>http://www.kallus.com/aroids/ediblearoids.htm as this may be some of what
>>you are interested in. If it is not, I am happy to help anyone develop such
>>a Web page that you describe, and I am sure that Lester would be happy to
>>add to the excellent informational and image content of his pages.
>>
>>Best regards, Scott
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
|
|
From: "Julius Boos" ju-bo at email.msn.com> on 2001.06.01 at 00:01:35(6656)
Dear Eduardo,
You are probably correct, but IF there are TWO species being sold here as
Yautia (or malanga) lilac, both with purplish rhizomes, both that grow to
look pretty much alike, then what species is the yellow-fleshed tuber,
called 'yautia amarillo', it has a black-skinned tuber, the inner flesh has
a lighter cork-like thick layer around the yellow flesh, has a flavor of
peanut/corn flour when grated and cooked in 'dumplings', or fried as
'acaras'.. We have been refering this one to X. atrovirens. I first saw
this rhizome being used grated and then folded and sealed as a 'covering'
for spiced meat, these 'arepas' would be then deep-fried. The photo was in
a 'Natural History' Mag., street vendor was in the Dominican Republic. The
rhizome has wire-like roots, and is generally sold around Christmas time, a
seasonally popular food? It grows leaves that are typically
Xanthosoma-like, but they have a greyish 'cast', and have more rounded tips
to the leaves lobes. I BELIEVE that Lynn Hannon may have a plant of this
growing.
The yellow/gold leaved Xanthosoma sp.that we see here in Florida was said to
have been originally collected somewhere in Central America where it was
being grown as a food-crop.
Best wishs,
Julius
| +More |
>>Dear aroiders,
I have checked the marvelous Lester?s site (see the link below) and have
found that there is a small error at the main page. The plant featured there
is Xanthosoma atrovirens, not X. violaceum. Despite the leaves really LOOK
violaceum (i.e. somewhat purplish), most of the aspect is given by the
combination of the dark green color (i.e. atro - black, virens - green) plus
the wax effect at the surface (that make it appear somewhat blue). However,
the petioles are green, and if we could see the main ribs below, they would
appear green, not purplish. Both species are usually confused there in
U.S.A., because both are usually sold with the same common names. If you
want to see a real X. violaceum, take a look at Krzysztof?s page in:
http://u1.netgate.net/~kk/Araceae/Xanthosoma/violaceum.html
Compare both pictures and you will never confuse them again.
Still on Xanthosomas, I have seen comments about the "Golden"
Xanthosoma in this list. I have seen it cultivated here in Brazil and I also
have some plants in my own collection (Xanthosoma is my favourite aroid).
The biggest individuals I have seen are cultivated at the Burle Marx
collection, and they became less golden with age. I have seen even flowering
individuals there, but I still couldn?t find out what the hell is this
plant! I am preparing an article ?bout the cultivated Xanthosoma, maybe to
be submitted to Aroideana 2002, so I HAVE to discover it someday! By now, I
think it is a form of the common X. sagittifolium, but I am not 100% sure.
In fact, I am not even 60% sure... Did someone mention 40% sure?
Best wishes,
Eduardo.
>From: "Scott Hyndman"
>Reply-To: aroid-l@mobot.org
>To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
>Subject: Re: Yautia/Xanthasoma Sprouting
>Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:08:47 -0500 (CDT)
>
>Susan,
>
>Please take a look at Lest Kallus' and Julius Boos' information at
>http://www.kallus.com/aroids/ediblearoids.htm as this may be some of what
>you are interested in. If it is not, I am happy to help anyone develop
>such
>a Web page that you describe, and I am sure that Lester would be happy to
>add to the excellent informational and image content of his pages.
>
>Best regards, Scott
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
|
|
From: George Yao gcyao at netasia.net> on 2001.06.01 at 19:08:01(6669)
Hi Eduardo,
In the same website you cited below, there is a page featuring Xanthosoma
maffafa aurea which looked like the Golden Xanthosoma I saw (from memory
only, if you please). Is it the same as the Golden Xanthosoma in the Burle
Marx collection?
George Yao
| +More |
Metro-Manila, Philippines
At 11:19 AM 5/31/01, you wrote:
>Dear aroiders,
>
> I have checked the marvelous Lester?s site (see the link below) and
> have found that there is a small error at the main page. The plant
> featured there is Xanthosoma atrovirens, not X. violaceum. Despite the
> leaves really LOOK violaceum (i.e. somewhat purplish), most of the aspect
> is given by the combination of the dark green color (i.e. atro - black,
> virens - green) plus the wax effect at the surface (that make it appear
> somewhat blue). However, the petioles are green, and if we could see the
> main ribs below, they would appear green, not purplish. Both species are
> usually confused there in U.S.A., because both are usually sold with the
> same common names. If you want to see a real X. violaceum, take a look at
> Krzysztof?s page in:
>
>http://u1.netgate.net/~kk/Araceae/Xanthosoma/violaceum.html
>
>
> Compare both pictures and you will never confuse them again.
>
> Still on Xanthosomas, I have seen comments about the "Golden"
> Xanthosoma in this list. I have seen it cultivated here in Brazil and I
> also have some plants in my own collection (Xanthosoma is my favourite
> aroid). The biggest individuals I have seen are cultivated at the Burle
> Marx collection, and they became less golden with age. I have seen even
> flowering individuals there, but I still couldn?t find out what the hell
> is this plant! I am preparing an article ?bout the cultivated Xanthosoma,
> maybe to be submitted to Aroideana 2002, so I HAVE to discover it
> someday! By now, I think it is a form of the common X. sagittifolium, but
> I am not 100% sure. In fact, I am not even 60% sure... Did someone
> mention 40% sure?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Eduardo.
>
>
>>From: "Scott Hyndman"
>>Reply-To: aroid-l@mobot.org
>>To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
>>Subject: Re: Yautia/Xanthasoma Sprouting
>>Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:08:47 -0500 (CDT)
>>
>>Susan,
>>
>>Please take a look at Lest Kallus' and Julius Boos' information at
>>http://www.kallus.com/aroids/ediblearoids.htm as this may be some of what
>>you are interested in. If it is not, I am happy to help anyone develop such
>>a Web page that you describe, and I am sure that Lester would be happy to
>>add to the excellent informational and image content of his pages.
>>
>>Best regards, Scott
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
|
|
From: "Eduardo Goncalves" edggon at hotmail.com> on 2001.06.13 at 15:00:26(6697)
Dear George,
Yes, I forgot this one. It is the same species I am talking about,
despite the individual featured in the picture is too young. The color is
too striking to forget! However, I am still considering if X. mafaffa is not
the same thing of X. sagittifolium. In fact, the X.
mafaffa-sagittifolium-robustum-roseum complex is the most puzzling problem
in aroid systematics, in my opinion. It may take me some time to solve.
Best wishes,
Eduardo.
| +More |
>Hi Eduardo,
>
>In the same website you cited below, there is a page featuring Xanthosoma
>maffafa aurea which looked like the Golden Xanthosoma I saw (from memory
>only, if you please). Is it the same as the Golden Xanthosoma in the Burle
>Marx collection?
>
>George Yao
>Metro-Manila, Philippines
>
>At 11:19 AM 5/31/01, you wrote:
>>Dear aroiders,
>>
>> I have checked the marvelous Lester?s site (see the link below) and
>>have found that there is a small error at the main page. The plant
>>featured there is Xanthosoma atrovirens, not X. violaceum. Despite the
>>leaves really LOOK violaceum (i.e. somewhat purplish), most of the aspect
>>is given by the combination of the dark green color (i.e. atro - black,
>>virens - green) plus the wax effect at the surface (that make it appear
>>somewhat blue). However, the petioles are green, and if we could see the
>>main ribs below, they would appear green, not purplish. Both species are
>>usually confused there in U.S.A., because both are usually sold with the
>>same common names. If you want to see a real X. violaceum, take a look at
>>Krzysztof?s page in:
>>
>>http://u1.netgate.net/~kk/Araceae/Xanthosoma/violaceum.html
>>
>>
>> Compare both pictures and you will never confuse them again.
>>
>> Still on Xanthosomas, I have seen comments about the "Golden"
>>Xanthosoma in this list. I have seen it cultivated here in Brazil and I
>>also have some plants in my own collection (Xanthosoma is my favourite
>>aroid). The biggest individuals I have seen are cultivated at the Burle
>>Marx collection, and they became less golden with age. I have seen even
>>flowering individuals there, but I still couldn?t find out what the hell
>>is this plant! I am preparing an article ?bout the cultivated Xanthosoma,
>>maybe to be submitted to Aroideana 2002, so I HAVE to discover it
>>someday! By now, I think it is a form of the common X. sagittifolium, but
>>I am not 100% sure. In fact, I am not even 60% sure... Did someone
>>mention 40% sure?
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Eduardo.
>>
>>
>>>From: "Scott Hyndman"
>>>Reply-To: aroid-l@mobot.org
>>>To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
>>>Subject: Re: Yautia/Xanthasoma Sprouting
>>>Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:08:47 -0500 (CDT)
>>>
>>>Susan,
>>>
>>>Please take a look at Lest Kallus' and Julius Boos' information at
>>>http://www.kallus.com/aroids/ediblearoids.htm as this may be some of what
>>>you are interested in. If it is not, I am happy to help anyone develop
>>>such
>>>a Web page that you describe, and I am sure that Lester would be happy to
>>>add to the excellent informational and image content of his pages.
>>>
>>>Best regards, Scott
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
|
|
From: "Eduardo Goncalves" edggon at hotmail.com> on 2001.06.13 at 15:00:40(6698)
Dear Julius,
As far as I know, X. atrovirens has a strong yellow parenchyma within
the "rhizomes", but some clones are just whitish yellow. I am not so aware
about the uses of this species, mainly in Northern America. An interesting
thing to do is buy these plants in markets, grow them and take pictures. If
pictures are posted in the web, we can try to give them some names. Not only
you, but any other aroid-l member could do it. So we would start to clean
all this Xanthosoma mess.
Yes, probably the X. sagittifolium complex (including the golden
Xanthosoma) originated in Central America (including the Caribbean Islands).
The problem is that most of the original vegetation has been cleared there,
the ancient cultures have gone and nobody knows if they were wild plants now
in cultivation or if they are cultivars developed by Pre-colombian people.
To make things more complex, most species were described based in cultivated
species, with obscure procedence. To make things even worse, most of the
species described by Schott were represented by type specimens destroyed
during the II World War! Do you want a final consideration? Even if they
were not destroyed, the slimy thing that Xanthosoma specimens turn into when
they are dry would not help much anyway!!!! Maybe their DNA can say
something about their origin, mainly if we compare with some wild collected
relatives. I am considering doing this in near future.
Very best wishes,
Eduardo.
| +More |
>Dear Eduardo,
>
>You are probably correct, but IF there are TWO species being sold here as
>Yautia (or malanga) lilac, both with purplish rhizomes, both that grow to
>look pretty much alike, then what species is the yellow-fleshed tuber,
>called 'yautia amarillo', it has a black-skinned tuber, the inner flesh has
>a lighter cork-like thick layer around the yellow flesh, has a flavor of
>peanut/corn flour when grated and cooked in 'dumplings', or fried as
>'acaras'.. We have been refering this one to X. atrovirens. I first
>saw
>this rhizome being used grated and then folded and sealed as a 'covering'
>for spiced meat, these 'arepas' would be then deep-fried. The photo was
>in
>a 'Natural History' Mag., street vendor was in the Dominican Republic.
>The
>rhizome has wire-like roots, and is generally sold around Christmas time, a
>seasonally popular food? It grows leaves that are typically
>Xanthosoma-like, but they have a greyish 'cast', and have more rounded tips
>to the leaves lobes. I BELIEVE that Lynn Hannon may have a plant of this
>growing.
>
>The yellow/gold leaved Xanthosoma sp.that we see here in Florida was said
>to
>have been originally collected somewhere in Central America where it was
>being grown as a food-crop.
>
>Best wishs,
>
>Julius
>
> >>Dear aroiders,
>
> I have checked the marvelous Lester?s site (see the link below) and
>have
>found that there is a small error at the main page. The plant featured
>there
>is Xanthosoma atrovirens, not X. violaceum. Despite the leaves really LOOK
>violaceum (i.e. somewhat purplish), most of the aspect is given by the
>combination of the dark green color (i.e. atro - black, virens - green)
>plus
>the wax effect at the surface (that make it appear somewhat blue). However,
>the petioles are green, and if we could see the main ribs below, they would
>appear green, not purplish. Both species are usually confused there in
>U.S.A., because both are usually sold with the same common names. If you
>want to see a real X. violaceum, take a look at Krzysztof?s page in:
>
>http://u1.netgate.net/~kk/Araceae/Xanthosoma/violaceum.html
>
>
> Compare both pictures and you will never confuse them again.
>
> Still on Xanthosomas, I have seen comments about the "Golden"
>Xanthosoma in this list. I have seen it cultivated here in Brazil and I
>also
>have some plants in my own collection (Xanthosoma is my favourite aroid).
>The biggest individuals I have seen are cultivated at the Burle Marx
>collection, and they became less golden with age. I have seen even
>flowering
>individuals there, but I still couldn?t find out what the hell is this
>plant! I am preparing an article ?bout the cultivated Xanthosoma, maybe to
>be submitted to Aroideana 2002, so I HAVE to discover it someday! By now, I
>think it is a form of the common X. sagittifolium, but I am not 100% sure.
>In fact, I am not even 60% sure... Did someone mention 40% sure?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Eduardo.
>
>
> >From: "Scott Hyndman"
> >Reply-To: aroid-l@mobot.org
> >To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
> >Subject: Re: Yautia/Xanthasoma Sprouting
> >Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:08:47 -0500 (CDT)
> >
> >Susan,
> >
> >Please take a look at Lest Kallus' and Julius Boos' information at
> >http://www.kallus.com/aroids/ediblearoids.htm as this may be some of what
> >you are interested in. If it is not, I am happy to help anyone develop
> >such
> >a Web page that you describe, and I am sure that Lester would be happy to
> >add to the excellent informational and image content of his pages.
> >
> >Best regards, Scott
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
|
|
From: George Yao gcyao at netasia.net> on 2001.06.14 at 15:50:18(6737)
Eduardo,
Thanks for your response. Next time I visit my friend, I'll bring my
digital camera to take some photos of his Golden Xanthosoma to be posted
here. They are already big plants, so presumably mature.
George Yao
| +More |
Metro-Manila, Philippines
At 11:00 PM 6/13/01, you wrote:
>Dear George,
>
> Yes, I forgot this one. It is the same species I am talking about,
> despite the individual featured in the picture is too young. The color is
> too striking to forget! However, I am still considering if X. mafaffa is
> not the same thing of X. sagittifolium. In fact, the X.
> mafaffa-sagittifolium-robustum-roseum complex is the most puzzling
> problem in aroid systematics, in my opinion. It may take me some time to solve.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Eduardo.
>
>>Hi Eduardo,
>>
>>In the same website you cited below, there is a page featuring Xanthosoma
>>maffafa aurea which looked like the Golden Xanthosoma I saw (from memory
>>only, if you please). Is it the same as the Golden Xanthosoma in the Burle
>>Marx collection?
>>
>>George Yao
>>Metro-Manila, Philippines
>>
>>At 11:19 AM 5/31/01, you wrote:
>>>Dear aroiders,
>>>
>>> I have checked the marvelous Lester?s site (see the link below) and
>>>have found that there is a small error at the main page. The plant
>>>featured there is Xanthosoma atrovirens, not X. violaceum. Despite the
>>>leaves really LOOK violaceum (i.e. somewhat purplish), most of the aspect
>>>is given by the combination of the dark green color (i.e. atro - black,
>>>virens - green) plus the wax effect at the surface (that make it appear
>>>somewhat blue). However, the petioles are green, and if we could see the
>>>main ribs below, they would appear green, not purplish. Both species are
>>>usually confused there in U.S.A., because both are usually sold with the
>>>same common names. If you want to see a real X. violaceum, take a look at
>>>Krzysztof?s page in:
>>>
>>>http://u1.netgate.net/~kk/Araceae/Xanthosoma/violaceum.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Compare both pictures and you will never confuse them again.
>>>
>>> Still on Xanthosomas, I have seen comments about the "Golden"
>>>Xanthosoma in this list. I have seen it cultivated here in Brazil and I
>>>also have some plants in my own collection (Xanthosoma is my favourite
>>>aroid). The biggest individuals I have seen are cultivated at the Burle
>>>Marx collection, and they became less golden with age. I have seen even
>>>flowering individuals there, but I still couldn?t find out what the hell
>>>is this plant! I am preparing an article ?bout the cultivated Xanthosoma,
>>>maybe to be submitted to Aroideana 2002, so I HAVE to discover it
>>>someday! By now, I think it is a form of the common X. sagittifolium, but
>>>I am not 100% sure. In fact, I am not even 60% sure... Did someone
>>>mention 40% sure?
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>>
>>> Eduardo.
>>>
>>>
>>>>From: "Scott Hyndman"
>>>>Reply-To: aroid-l@mobot.org
>>>>To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
>>>>Subject: Re: Yautia/Xanthasoma Sprouting
>>>>Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:08:47 -0500 (CDT)
>>>>
>>>>Susan,
>>>>
>>>>Please take a look at Lest Kallus' and Julius Boos' information at
>>>>http://www.kallus.com/aroids/ediblearoids.htm as this may be some of what
>>>>you are interested in. If it is not, I am happy to help anyone develop
>>>>such
>>>>a Web page that you describe, and I am sure that Lester would be happy to
>>>>add to the excellent informational and image content of his pages.
>>>>
>>>>Best regards, Scott
George Yao
Metro-Manila, Philippines
|
|
From: "Julius Boos" ju-bo at email.msn.com> on 2001.06.14 at 16:22:08(6739)
Dear Eduardo,
Just so that you can add the information to your notes, the X. 'atrovirens'
in the photo I BELIEVE was grown from rhizomes that, at first glance, could
be mistaken for the rhizomes of X. violacium, and these have a definite
'growing tip', and the outer surface of the rhizome lacks roots, is always
'clean' and smooth, while the rhizomes of the yellow-fleshed species are
VERY different, the outer 'skin' color of these is almost black, many stiff
wire-like roors remains always are attached to the rhizome, which generally
does NOT have a growing tip, the growers must cut the 'head' off the plant
and re-plant it.
There are certainly at LEAST two VERY different species involved here, not
just two clones with different colored 'flesh'. Even the taste is VERY
different between these two!!!!
I will TRY to start buying and growing the rhizomes when next I see them for
sale here, and anyone who wants to assist may contact me---the rhizomes
themselves should be photographed, notes on color and outer/inner colors and
appearance taken, then when/if they grow, the plants produced should be
photographed. This way Eduardo can 'link' the rhizomes to the plants.
Good luck w/ your work, Ed, and please keep in touch!
Sincerely,
Julius
| +More |
>>Dear Julius,
As far as I know, X. atrovirens has a strong yellow parenchyma within
the "rhizomes", but some clones are just whitish yellow. I am not so aware
about the uses of this species, mainly in Northern America. An interesting
thing to do is buy these plants in markets, grow them and take pictures. If
pictures are posted in the web, we can try to give them some names. Not only
you, but any other aroid-l member could do it. So we would start to clean
all this Xanthosoma mess.
Yes, probably the X. sagittifolium complex (including the golden
Xanthosoma) originated in Central America (including the Caribbean Islands).
The problem is that most of the original vegetation has been cleared there,
the ancient cultures have gone and nobody knows if they were wild plants now
in cultivation or if they are cultivars developed by Pre-colombian people.
To make things more complex, most species were described based in cultivated
species, with obscure procedence. To make things even worse, most of the
species described by Schott were represented by type specimens destroyed
during the II World War! Do you want a final consideration? Even if they
were not destroyed, the slimy thing that Xanthosoma specimens turn into when
they are dry would not help much anyway!!!! Maybe their DNA can say
something about their origin, mainly if we compare with some wild collected
relatives. I am considering doing this in near future.
Very best wishes,
Eduardo.<<
>Dear Eduardo,
>
>You are probably correct, but IF there are TWO species being sold here as
>Yautia (or malanga) lilac, both with purplish rhizomes, both that grow to
>look pretty much alike, then what species is the yellow-fleshed tuber,
>called 'yautia amarillo', it has a black-skinned tuber, the inner flesh has
>a lighter cork-like thick layer around the yellow flesh, has a flavor of
>peanut/corn flour when grated and cooked in 'dumplings', or fried as
>'acaras'.. We have been refering this one to X. atrovirens. I first
>saw
>this rhizome being used grated and then folded and sealed as a 'covering'
>for spiced meat, these 'arepas' would be then deep-fried. The photo was
>in
>a 'Natural History' Mag., street vendor was in the Dominican Republic.
>The
>rhizome has wire-like roots, and is generally sold around Christmas time, a
>seasonally popular food? It grows leaves that are typically
>Xanthosoma-like, but they have a greyish 'cast', and have more rounded tips
>to the leaves lobes. I BELIEVE that Lynn Hannon may have a plant of this
>growing.
>
>The yellow/gold leaved Xanthosoma sp.that we see here in Florida was said
>to
>have been originally collected somewhere in Central America where it was
>being grown as a food-crop.
>
>Best wishs,
>
>Julius
>
> >>Dear aroiders,
>
> I have checked the marvelous Lester?s site (see the link below) and
>have
>found that there is a small error at the main page. The plant featured
>there
>is Xanthosoma atrovirens, not X. violaceum. Despite the leaves really LOOK
>violaceum (i.e. somewhat purplish), most of the aspect is given by the
>combination of the dark green color (i.e. atro - black, virens - green)
>plus
>the wax effect at the surface (that make it appear somewhat blue). However,
>the petioles are green, and if we could see the main ribs below, they would
>appear green, not purplish. Both species are usually confused there in
>U.S.A., because both are usually sold with the same common names. If you
>want to see a real X. violaceum, take a look at Krzysztof?s page in:
>
>http://u1.netgate.net/~kk/Araceae/Xanthosoma/violaceum.html
>
>
> Compare both pictures and you will never confuse them again.
>
> Still on Xanthosomas, I have seen comments about the "Golden"
>Xanthosoma in this list. I have seen it cultivated here in Brazil and I
>also
>have some plants in my own collection (Xanthosoma is my favourite aroid).
>The biggest individuals I have seen are cultivated at the Burle Marx
>collection, and they became less golden with age. I have seen even
>flowering
>individuals there, but I still couldn?t find out what the hell is this
>plant! I am preparing an article ?bout the cultivated Xanthosoma, maybe to
>be submitted to Aroideana 2002, so I HAVE to discover it someday! By now, I
>think it is a form of the common X. sagittifolium, but I am not 100% sure.
>In fact, I am not even 60% sure... Did someone mention 40% sure?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Eduardo.
>
>
> >From: "Scott Hyndman"
> >Reply-To: aroid-l@mobot.org
> >To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
> >Subject: Re: Yautia/Xanthasoma Sprouting
> >Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:08:47 -0500 (CDT)
> >
> >Susan,
> >
> >Please take a look at Lest Kallus' and Julius Boos' information at
> >http://www.kallus.com/aroids/ediblearoids.htm as this may be some of what
> >you are interested in. If it is not, I am happy to help anyone develop
> >such
> >a Web page that you describe, and I am sure that Lester would be happy to
> >add to the excellent informational and image content of his pages.
> >
> >Best regards, Scott
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
|
|
From: "brian williams" pugturd50 at hotmail.com> on 2002.01.23 at 14:58:18(8040)
Hello well I have not bugged the group in sometime so I thought I would fish
for a few plants I would like to get. By the way my greenhouse is doing
great. Working on the rock walls each side is 75ft long and 10ft tall its
going to take me a long time. But I am off to a good start with the
foundation and all. I plan to take pics of my progress.
Well, I have had great success with many Xanthosomas and have seen PICS and
heard of larger forms with colorful stems and leafs. Some that look like
caladiums as well as huged leaf forms that dwarf most aroids.
Now I have manly the most common forms out there that are eaten and a few
ornamental forms. I would like to know if anyone has any other forms growing
and most of all pups to spare in a trade or sell.
Looking up Xanthosoma on the net I found many names that I don't know of.
Here is a list I put a star next to the ones I have. THANKS
10938 Xanthosoma alberttii
| +More |
10939 Xanthosoma atrovirens * I believe i have one or two forms of this
10940 Xanthosoma belophyllum
10941 Xanthosoma brasiliense
10942 Xanthosoma caracu
17600 Xanthosoma helleborifolium
10943 Xanthosoma jacquini * I have the common mutated leaf form
10944 Xanthosoma mafaffa * the yellow form I have
78671 Xanthosoma robusta
10945 Xanthosoma robustum
2168 Xanthosoma sagittifolium*
2169 Xanthosoma sp.
2170 Xanthosoma violaceum*
mexicanum Liebm.
robustum Schott
roseum Schott
undipes (K. Koch & Bouch?) K. Koch
violaceum Schott
wendlandii (Schott) Schott
Xanthosoma daguense
Xanthosoma fractum
Xanthosoma stenospathum
Xanthosoma viviparum
Xanthosoma nigrum
Xanthosoma caracu
Xanthosoma pubescens
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
|
|
From: "sullivan" paulsull at sunline.net> on 2002.01.24 at 15:57:35(8064)
i would be interested in hearing about Xanthasomas that look like overgrown
caladiums.
----- Original Message -----
| +More |
To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 9:59 AM
Subject: Xanthosoma
>
> Hello well I have not bugged the group in sometime so I thought I would
fish
> for a few plants I would like to get. By the way my greenhouse is doing
> great. Working on the rock walls each side is 75ft long and 10ft tall its
> going to take me a long time. But I am off to a good start with the
> foundation and all. I plan to take pics of my progress.
>
> Well, I have had great success with many Xanthosomas and have seen PICS
and
> heard of larger forms with colorful stems and leafs. Some that look like
> caladiums as well as huged leaf forms that dwarf most aroids.
>
> Now I have manly the most common forms out there that are eaten and a few
> ornamental forms. I would like to know if anyone has any other forms
growing
> and most of all pups to spare in a trade or sell.
>
> Looking up Xanthosoma on the net I found many names that I don't know of.
> Here is a list I put a star next to the ones I have. THANKS
>
> 10938 Xanthosoma alberttii
> 10939 Xanthosoma atrovirens * I believe i have one or two forms of this
> 10940 Xanthosoma belophyllum
> 10941 Xanthosoma brasiliense
> 10942 Xanthosoma caracu
> 17600 Xanthosoma helleborifolium
> 10943 Xanthosoma jacquini * I have the common mutated leaf form
> 10944 Xanthosoma mafaffa * the yellow form I have
> 78671 Xanthosoma robusta
> 10945 Xanthosoma robustum
> 2168 Xanthosoma sagittifolium*
> 2169 Xanthosoma sp.
> 2170 Xanthosoma violaceum*
>
> mexicanum Liebm.
>
>
> robustum Schott
>
>
> roseum Schott
>
>
> undipes (K. Koch & Bouch?) K. Koch
>
>
> violaceum Schott
>
>
> wendlandii (Schott) Schott
>
>
> Xanthosoma daguense
>
> Xanthosoma fractum
> Xanthosoma stenospathum
> Xanthosoma viviparum
>
>
> Xanthosoma nigrum
>
> Xanthosoma caracu
>
> Xanthosoma pubescens
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
>
>
|
|
From: "FrankBln" f_h_bln at gmx.net> on 2006.03.30 at 13:54:23(14026)
Hello members,
some months ago I have bought to little rhizomes of
Xanthosoma sagittifolium and X. maffafa. While the first one grows very well,
the latter just develops one leave which gets brown after unfolding and dies
off when the second comes. I have the plant on this sill of a south facing
window, normal room temperature. I have prepared a more open substrate mix compared
to the one of the X. sag., because I have heard that it maffafa easily rots. Shall
I transplant it in a mor water retaining substrate. I also tried to let some
water rest in the saucer beneath, but it does not help. Any hints are
appreciated.
| +More |
Thanks
Frank, Berlin, Germany
_______________________________________________
Aroid-l mailing list
Aroid-l@gizmoworks.com
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
|
|
Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.
|
|