Re: Philodendron selloum

From: SelbyHort at aol.com on 2001.12.13 at 15:46:12(7906) To add to Neil's comments below and Julius' earlier about older collections of this species in Florida, some older FL hort books and trade publications listed both P. selloum and P. bipinnatifidum as distinct species. About 20-30 years ago in the FL nursery trade sometimes the names were used almost in a varietal or even cultivar sense. During those years in the hort trade, the P. bipinnatifidum "form" was considered superior and more sought after. I seem to recall from my retail nursery days in the early-mid 1980s that any plant labeled with the name P. bipinnatifidum sold for a higher price than those labeled as P. selloum. Probably some unscrupulous nursery owners capitalized on this and labeled all their seedling plants with this name to garner a few more dollars, other growers actually produced cuttings taken from some select forms and gave them the P. bipinnatifidum name to distinguish them. The latter were far less common in cultivation and quite rightly fetched the highest price. Occasionally some newspaper or magazine article would elaborate on these plants and discuss the various points of difference between the two "forms" in cultivation. Afterwards customers would come in asking for P. bipinnatifidum and would turn up their noses at any plant labeled with the P. selloum name as a "common" seedling of unknown parentage, and less desirable, thus we always tried to keep a small supply of plants, acquired from trusted wholesale sources as cutting-grown P. bipinnatifidum, for our more "discriminating" buyers! In the back nursery area we kept some stock plants of a few superior P. bipinnatifidum forms to propagate for special customers, because we could not always find a wholesale source for the "true" P. bipinnatifidum grown only from cuttings. Later, this P. bipinnatifidum name became lost in the trade and all you could find were the uniform plants labeled as P. selloum. I guess it simply became uneconomical for wholesale growers to produce cuttings of those special forms, so one could no longer find all the variations of this species in nurseries. Donna Atwood +More << some confusion has existed in the past over P. selloum and P. bipinnatifidum....Engler considered them separate species. the two names have in the past been used to differentiate two different populations (Gottsberger and Amaral 1984) and In 1991 Mayo joined the two into one single species ....P. bippinatifidum is the true name....P. selloum has been reduced into synonomy. >>

Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.