On 16 December 2014 at 01:18, DAVID LEEDY wrote:
Peter,
Since you asked:
PRO - The extensive amount of color photography was wonderful and one can
really obtain an understanding of the plants being described.
PRO - The disclosure of the annual meeting business, including financial statements and minutes, may have been done in the past, but they are surely open in the Newsletter, which can only be good.
CON - The extensive amount of publishing credits following the articles on Wong Sin Yeng and Li Heng deract not only from the article, but from the overall newsletter. While some of the publications listed look rather interesting, one wonders where they have been and why they are not available?
My opinion only.
David Leedy
On Monday, December 15, 2014 10:35 AM, D. Christopher Rogers wrote:
Good morning!
Just back from a long weekend, and read the newsletter. It is really impressive. It amazes me, Peter. It seems like every time you go out side you find new species. Thank you for sharing this glimpse into our world's biodiversity.
Christopher
On 14 December 2014 at 00:27, Peter Boyce
wrote:
I am *mildly* surprised that has been no feedback - positive or negative - on the December Newsletter. At 31 pages it is longer than many of the early issues of Aroideana.
_______________________________________________
Aroid-L mailing list
Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
--
D. Christopher Rogers ((,///////////======= |