Naturalist-at-Large
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:38:11 -0600
From: "Tom Croat"
Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Anthurium elegans taxonomy
To: "Discussion of aroids"
Message-ID:
href="mailto:F96F97BCBD9C1C46A99B1FDBD2644C2F0CAF7E@MBGMail01.mobot.org"F96F97BCBD9C1C46A99B1FDBD2644C2F0CAF7E@MBGMail01.mobot.org/a>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Dear David: There is a mistake in the World Checklist. Anthurium elegans Engl. Is a synonym of A. pedatum (L) Schott. In my copy of the checklist I have also included A. fortunatum Bunting as being equal to A. pedatum.
Tom
________________________________
From: aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com [mailto:aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com] On Behalf Of david br?derbauer
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 3:01 AM
To:
href="mailto:aroid-l@gizmoworks.com">aroid-l@gizmoworks.com
Subject: [Aroid-l] Anthurium elegans taxonomy
Dear Aroiders,
I have received an inflorescence of Anthurium elegans from Josef Bogner some time ago. Now I checked it's taxonomic status on the Kew Monocot checklist. There, Anthurium elegans is listed as synonym for 2 species, Anthurium palmatum and A. fortunatum.
Josef Bogner says that his specimen is different from A. palmatum. So it could be Anthurium fortunatum - or is Anthurium elegans itself still a valid species?
Thanks for help!
David Broederbauer
University of Vienna, Austria
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/private/aroid-l/attachments/20120124/9e3d9277/attachment.htm
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Aroid-L mailing list
Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
End of Aroid-L Digest, Vol 90, Issue 10
***************************************
---1789264316-730516732-1327512081=:92726--
--==============C82683717331368946==
|