sold as A. ‘Crystal Hope’ and the second is sold as A.
clarinervium. Both of these plants have reached their maximum size and will
not grow any larger. Both are essentially “dwarf”. Jay Vannini has
just provided us with some of his observations on ‘Crystal Hope’.
Although the
A. clarinervium in the picture is of a plant produced by tissue culture, it is virtually
identical to plants of that species which I have gown before tissue culture was
invented, as far as my recollection serves me. These tissue-cultured plants
also produce orange berries.
John.
From: aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com [mailto:aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com]
On Behalf Of Marek Argent
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 6:29
PM
To: Steve@ExoticRainforest.com;
discussion of aroids
Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Anthurium
unknown! - banta
Hello,
Yes, I wanted to make myself sure, because I have
almost an identical plant,
the leaves of my specimen are more round, but it
is a juvenile plant yet.
href="http://www.wschowa.com/abrimaal/araceum/anthurium/crystallinum.htm">http://www.wschowa.com/abrimaal/araceum/anthurium/crystallinum.htm
In the meantime John Criswick sent 2 photos to
Aroid-L and it caused the chaos.
I dare to send them again.
I think that 1890 is A. leuconeurum or a young A.
magnificum
and 1892 is probably a form of A. clarinervium or a
hybrid.
Marek
----- Original Message -----
From:
href="mailto:Steve@ExoticRainforest.com" title="Steve@ExoticRainforest.com">ExoticRainforest
To:
href="mailto:abri1973@wp.pl" title="abri1973@wp.pl">Marek Argent
Sent: Tuesday,
May 11, 2010 11:12 PM
Subject: Re:
[Aroid-l] Anthurium unknown! - banta
The one in the blue link below that you gave me.
Steve
On 5/11/2010 03:07, Marek Argent wrote:
Hello,
Now everything has messed. What Anthurium are we
talking about?
This one from the IAS meeting or those John
Criswick sent to identify?
Marek
----- Original Message -----
From:
href="mailto:Steve@ExoticRainforest.com" title="Steve@ExoticRainforest.com"
moz-do-not-send=true>ExoticRainforest
To:
href="mailto:aroid-l@gizmoworks.com" title="aroid-l@gizmoworks.com"
moz-do-not-send=true>Discussion of aroids
Sent: Tuesday,
May 11, 2010 7:26 PM
Subject: Re:
[Aroid-l] Anthurium unknown! - banta
As per Julius' request yesterday, below is my response
from John Banta who is lovingly known to many aroiders as "the
Banta". Banta has been around since the beginning of the IAS and is
a wealth of knowledge. This response is in regard to the discussion on
this forum in regard to the plant that appeared to be related to either
Anthurium crystallinum or a similar species. It also strongly appears the
mystery plant in Zach's photo has been solved but as the Banta often does, he
presents some additional mystery into the discussion.
href="http://aroid.org/midamerica/201004images/032.jpg" target="_blank"
title="blocked::http://aroid.org/midamerica/201004images/032.jpg"
moz-do-not-send=true>http://aroid.org/midamerica/201004images/032.jpg
His answer to my original request:
On 5/11/2010 09:49, John Banta wrote:
Hi Steve, this is like seeing a ghost. I had this
plant years ago. It always puzzled me. At the time I was quite interested in
the Mexican Anthuriums. especially those with orange berries as they all seemed
to hybridize well between each other. I,m not certain where I got the plant
originally, but I placed it with the crystallinium and magnificum and
forgetti group, It lacks the strong chordate leaf shape of clarinervium.
When I first saw the fruit color (yellow/orange) I realized that this was a great
plant for breeding. Never got anything from that plant. The Anthurium pictured
should have purple berries, if they are yellow/orange you have one very
special plant. Good luck, banta
My response to Banta:
Thanks a bunch John! The plant was photographed in the Missouri Botanical Garden
collection and even though I was there, I never saw it. Julius was sure
you could fill in some info so thanks very much for the input. I am
passing it on to the others who were involved in this discussion. It is
my understanding Tom has identified it as A.
crystallinum.
Nie znaleziono virusa w tej wiadomosci przychodzacej.
Sprawdzone przez AVG - www.avg.com
Wersja: 8.5.437 / Baza danych wirusw: 271.1.1/2867 - Data wydania: 05/11/10
06:26:00
Nie znaleziono virusa w tej wiadomosci przychodzacej.
Sprawdzone przez AVG - www.avg.com
Wersja: 8.5.437 / Baza danych wirusw: 271.1.1/2867 - Data wydania: 05/11/10
06:26:00
------=_NextPart_000_005B_01CAF1B2.652C1160--
--==============#62750241489577635= |