Re: [Aroid-l] Aroid systematics

From: "Marek Argent" <abri1973 at wp.pl> on 2010.02.25 at 14:38:53(20668) Hello again. I think I'm answering to myself: Another document I've found shows the cladogram I know. http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/reprint/95/9/1153.pdf Marek HTML +More ----- Original Message ----- From: Marek Argent To: discussion of aroids Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 4:35 PM Subject: [Aroid-l] Aroid systematics Hello, In my site there's a page with Araceae systematics, http://www..wschowa.com/abrimaal/araceum/pages/sys.htm I think it is out of date. Today I read a document from 2008 http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/reprint/95/12/1569.pdf and I found there that the subfamily Monsteroideae is now tribes Monstereae and Spathiphylleae within the subfamily Pothoideae. Philodendron is not in Aroideae, but in it's own subfamily Philodendroideae (with tribes Philodendreae, Montrichardieae and I don't know what else). Maybe Homalomeneae too? Can anyone confirm this is true? Where can I find an up to date systematics? Please help, Marek _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l Nie znaleziono virusa w tej wiadomo¶ci przychodz±cej. Sprawdzone przez AVG - www.avg.com Wersja: 8.5.435 / Baza danych wirusów: 271.1.1/2707 - Data wydania: 02/24/10 07:34:00 ------=_NextPart_000_00EA_01CAB630.A2CB0520----==============782719047762974415=

Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.