From: hetter at xs4all.nl (Wilbert Hetterscheid) on 2007.08.17 at 20:56:24(16120)
Hi there Christopher and Bernhard,
I pulled my mind out of the swamp it is in this holiday and reconsidered my
position on the tuber: it may indeed be an Amchomanes as Christopher
suggests and I rejected in my previous post. I noticed upon further looking
that there are a few roots left on it which seem to be as thick as is usual
in Anchomanes. I missed the roots, which are semi-permanent in Anchomanes
but must have been removed. It is a trifle stupid that the collector made no
picture of the leaf when it was still on the plant, or conveniently didn't
show them................
| +More |
Cheerio,
Lord P(ardon me).
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: aroid-l-bounces at gizmoworks.com
> [mailto:aroid-l-bounces at gizmoworks.com] Namens D. Christopher Rogers
> Verzonden: vrijdag 17 augustus 2007 19:18
> Aan: Discussion of aroids
> Onderwerp: Re: [Aroid-l] Amorphophallus tuber?
>
> Hiyer, Wilbert!
>
> So, my first thought had been Anchomanes. You say no. Why am
> I wrong? What salient characters did I miss?
>
> Happy days,
> Christopher
>
> D. Christopher Rogers
> Invertebrate Ecologist/Taxonomist
> ((,///////////=====<
>
> EcoAnalysts, Inc.
> (530) 406-1178
> 707 Dead Cat Alley
> Suite 201
> Woodland, CA 95695 USA
>
> ? Invertebrate Taxonomy
> ? Invertebrate Ecological Studies
> ? Bioassessment and Study Design
> ? Endangered Invertebrate Species
> ? Periphyton/ Phytoplankton
> ? Zooplankton
>
>
> Moscow, ID ? Bozeman, MT ? Woodland, CA ? Joplin, MO ?
> Selinsgrove, PA www.ecoanalysts.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aroid-l-bounces at gizmoworks.com
> [mailto:aroid-l-bounces at gizmoworks.com]On Behalf Of Wilbert
> Hetterscheid
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 12:33 AM
> To: 'Discussion of aroids'
> Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Amorphophallus tuber?
>
> Bernhard,
>
> I don't think it is an Amorph. First off it seems to have the
> shape of a short rhizome, unknown in African Amorphs. Next,
> every bud on the sides of the rhizome seem to have one or two
> big leaf/inflorescence scars, also not the way an Amorph
> grows. It must be another type of aroid. It is also not
> Anchomanes. I would sooner think it may be Lasimorpha or something.
>
> Cheerio,
> Lord P(rotector of the purity of Amorphophallus morphology)
>
>
>
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: aroid-l-bounces at gizmoworks.com
> > [mailto:aroid-l-bounces at gizmoworks.com] Namens StroWi at t-online.de
> > Verzonden: donderdag 16 augustus 2007 11:18
> > Aan: aroid-L
> > Onderwerp: [Aroid-l] Amorphophallus tuber?
> >
> > Aroiders,
> >
> > this picture
> >
> > http://www.amorphophallus-forum.de/viewtopic.php?t22
> >
> > was made in Ghana and Georg thinks that it is an Amorphophallus
> > species.
> > Any sugestions which one?
> >
> > From the "eyes"/"buds" evenly spread around the tuber and the thick
> > roots, I doubt that it is an Amorphophallus since I have
> never seen an
> > Amorphophallus tuber like this....
> >
> > On the other hand I am not Lord P.(rofound)............ :-)
> >
> > Looking forweward to any comment...
> >
> > Best,
> > Bernhard.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aroid-L mailing list
> > Aroid-L at www.gizmoworks.com
> > http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aroid-L mailing list
> Aroid-L at www.gizmoworks.com
> http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aroid-L mailing list
> Aroid-L at www.gizmoworks.com
> http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
>
|
IAS on Facebook
IAS on Instagram
