IAS on Facebook
IAS on Instagram
|
IAS Aroid Quasi Forum
About Aroid-L
This is a continuously updated archive of the Aroid-L mailing list in a forum format - not an actual Forum. If you want to post, you will still need to register for the Aroid-L mailing list and send your postings by e-mail for moderation in the normal way.
What is Aneuploidy?
|
From: ted.held at us.henkel.com (ted.held at us.henkel.com) on 2008.01.07 at 18:01:38(16930)
Dear List,
I have managed to finish the latest Aroideana. It's probably a good thing
for me this comes out only once a year as it seems like it takes me a year
to read and digest what's in one. Being a lay person, some of the articles
can be heavy-going. The one entitled "The Chromosome Numbers of the Aroid
Genera", by Dr. Bogner, is a case in point. I am trying to sort out what
the apparent promiscuity of aroids with regard to chromosome numbers might
mean. Here are some questions?
1. Do all the plants within a given species have the same basic "X" number
of chromosomes? Does this mean a species within the genus Landoltia, for
example, might have a normal 2n chromosome count of 40 with haploid (2n =
20), diploid (2n = 80), etc., variations, but not 2n = 46? So if you have
two plants, one with 2n = 40 and another with 2n = 46, do you know you
have two different species?
2. Can plants with different chromosome counts be cross fertile? Can a 2n
= 40 plant produce viable seed with its own diploid? How about with a
plant in the same genus with a chromosome count of 2n = 46?
3. What happens when a plant messes up and undergoes aneuploidy.
Aneuploidy is defined in the text as when some type of evolution takes
place where the offspring end up with a few extra chromosomes here and
there. Doesn't this mess up the plant? If not, why not?
4. Similarly, there is a term called dysploidy where a few chromosomes
don't make it into the new plants, or where old chromosomes get pieces
chewed off, somehow. Don't plants need at least a portion of the
information contained in the chromosome arms? Doesn't this mess up the
plant? If not, why not?
5. Can a plant that has experienced aneuploidy or dysploidy produce viable
seed with a normal-count plant? Or does the plant have to reproduce
vegetatively for a while until there is another receptive brother or
sister with whom to mate?
6. How much messing around with chromosome numbers does it take before the
morphological differences are large enough to produce a new genus?
Please take pity on me. When I went to school all this was very new. Come
to think of it Darwin was new stuff back in those days.
Ted.
| +More |
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/private/aroid-l/attachments/20080107/0b99f779/attachment.htm
|
|
From: lbmkjm at yahoo.com (brian lee) on 2008.01.08 at 09:48:24(16932)
Dear Ted,
Aloha. I think the best thing for you to do is to
look at Botany Online...it will help you on some of
the questions you pose.
In a nutshell, aneuploidy messes things up. In
humans, tumors and Down's Syndrome are examples. In
plants, death or deviant growth patterns are observed.
Aloha,
Leland
| +More |
--- ted.held at us.henkel.com wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I have managed to finish the latest Aroideana. It's
> probably a good thing
> for me this comes out only once a year as it seems
> like it takes me a year
> to read and digest what's in one. Being a lay
> person, some of the articles
> can be heavy-going. The one entitled "The Chromosome
> Numbers of the Aroid
> Genera", by Dr. Bogner, is a case in point. I am
> trying to sort out what
> the apparent promiscuity of aroids with regard to
> chromosome numbers might
> mean. Here are some questions?
>
> 1. Do all the plants within a given species have the
> same basic "X" number
> of chromosomes? Does this mean a species within the
> genus Landoltia, for
> example, might have a normal 2n chromosome count of
> 40 with haploid (2n =
> 20), diploid (2n = 80), etc., variations, but not 2n
> = 46? So if you have
> two plants, one with 2n = 40 and another with 2n =
> 46, do you know you
> have two different species?
> 2. Can plants with different chromosome counts be
> cross fertile? Can a 2n
> = 40 plant produce viable seed with its own diploid?
> How about with a
> plant in the same genus with a chromosome count of
> 2n = 46?
> 3. What happens when a plant messes up and undergoes
> aneuploidy.
> Aneuploidy is defined in the text as when some type
> of evolution takes
> place where the offspring end up with a few extra
> chromosomes here and
> there. Doesn't this mess up the plant? If not, why
> not?
> 4. Similarly, there is a term called dysploidy where
> a few chromosomes
> don't make it into the new plants, or where old
> chromosomes get pieces
> chewed off, somehow. Don't plants need at least a
> portion of the
> information contained in the chromosome arms?
> Doesn't this mess up the
> plant? If not, why not?
> 5. Can a plant that has experienced aneuploidy or
> dysploidy produce viable
> seed with a normal-count plant? Or does the plant
> have to reproduce
> vegetatively for a while until there is another
> receptive brother or
> sister with whom to mate?
> 6. How much messing around with chromosome numbers
> does it take before the
> morphological differences are large enough to
> produce a new genus?
>
> Please take pity on me. When I went to school all
> this was very new. Come
> to think of it Darwin was new stuff back in those
> days.
>
> Ted.
> > _______________________________________________
> Aroid-L mailing list
> Aroid-L at www.gizmoworks.com
> http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
|
|
From: Thomas.Croat at mobot.org (Tom Croat) on 2008.01.09 at 20:35:37(16937)
Dear Ted:
In our breeding studies here at the Missouri Botanical Gardens
we have found that intersectional crosses are rare, usually impossible
so the chromosome counts are not the only determining factor because
several sections share 2n0. Also aneuploidy appears to be in evidence
in sect. Porphyrochitonium which has chromosome levels of 28,29,30, 31
for example and these numbers can arrive by unequal crossing and through
the production of triploids which can cross because they have a full
complement of chromosomes. Really we ought to get Dick Sheffer to
expound on this. That is his area of expertice.
Tom
| +More |
-----Original Message-----
From: aroid-l-bounces at gizmoworks.com
[mailto:aroid-l-bounces at gizmoworks.com] On Behalf Of brian lee
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 3:48 AM
To: Discussion of aroids
Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] What is Aneuploidy?
Dear Ted,
Aloha. I think the best thing for you to do is to
look at Botany Online...it will help you on some of
the questions you pose.
In a nutshell, aneuploidy messes things up. In
humans, tumors and Down's Syndrome are examples. In
plants, death or deviant growth patterns are observed.
Aloha,
Leland
--- ted.held at us.henkel.com wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I have managed to finish the latest Aroideana. It's
> probably a good thing
> for me this comes out only once a year as it seems
> like it takes me a year
> to read and digest what's in one. Being a lay
> person, some of the articles
> can be heavy-going. The one entitled "The Chromosome
> Numbers of the Aroid
> Genera", by Dr. Bogner, is a case in point. I am
> trying to sort out what
> the apparent promiscuity of aroids with regard to
> chromosome numbers might
> mean. Here are some questions?
>
> 1. Do all the plants within a given species have the
> same basic "X" number
> of chromosomes? Does this mean a species within the
> genus Landoltia, for
> example, might have a normal 2n chromosome count of
> 40 with haploid (2n =
> 20), diploid (2n = 80), etc., variations, but not 2n
> = 46? So if you have
> two plants, one with 2n = 40 and another with 2n =
> 46, do you know you
> have two different species?
> 2. Can plants with different chromosome counts be
> cross fertile? Can a 2n
> = 40 plant produce viable seed with its own diploid?
> How about with a
> plant in the same genus with a chromosome count of
> 2n = 46?
> 3. What happens when a plant messes up and undergoes
> aneuploidy.
> Aneuploidy is defined in the text as when some type
> of evolution takes
> place where the offspring end up with a few extra
> chromosomes here and
> there. Doesn't this mess up the plant? If not, why
> not?
> 4. Similarly, there is a term called dysploidy where
> a few chromosomes
> don't make it into the new plants, or where old
> chromosomes get pieces
> chewed off, somehow. Don't plants need at least a
> portion of the
> information contained in the chromosome arms?
> Doesn't this mess up the
> plant? If not, why not?
> 5. Can a plant that has experienced aneuploidy or
> dysploidy produce viable
> seed with a normal-count plant? Or does the plant
> have to reproduce
> vegetatively for a while until there is another
> receptive brother or
> sister with whom to mate?
> 6. How much messing around with chromosome numbers
> does it take before the
> morphological differences are large enough to
> produce a new genus?
>
> Please take pity on me. When I went to school all
> this was very new. Come
> to think of it Darwin was new stuff back in those
> days.
>
> Ted.
> > _______________________________________________
> Aroid-L mailing list
> Aroid-L at www.gizmoworks.com
> http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
>
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
_______________________________________________
Aroid-L mailing list
Aroid-L at www.gizmoworks.com
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
|
|
From: agrsuw at ku.ac.th (agrsuw at ku.ac.th) on 2008.01.10 at 09:49:37(16939)
Dear Ted,
I really like your questions. I would like to answer your questions as
followed:
| +More |
1. Do all the plants within a given species have the same basic "X" number of
chromosomes?
=Yes. The basic chromosome number ( X or N ) is assigned to a given species or
genus.
Does this mean a species within the genus Landoltia, for example, might have a
normal 2n chromosome count of 40 with haploid (2n = 20), diploid (2n = 80),
etc., variations, but not 2n = 46?
= Normally, individuals in a species share the same chromosome number. However,
some deviation in the number can naturally occur. Aneuploidy is the one with a
change in chromosome number (for example 2n = 2N+1, = 2N+1+1, = 2N-, 2N - 1-1)
while euploidy is the one with the change in number of chromosome set (for
example 2n = N, = 3N, = 4N). By the way, 2n is the chromosome number normally
counted from root tip while n (haploid number) is the chromosome number
normally counted from anther. In your case, 2n = 80 should be tetraploid, not
diploid.
So if you have two plants, one with 2n = 40 and another with 2n = 46, do you
know you have two different species?
= From the chromosome number you gave, it is most likely to be 2 different
species. The difference (6) is too high to be an aneuploidy, but you can not
tell. In Aglaonema costatum, 2n = 40 and 48.
2. Can plants with different chromosome counts be cross fertile?
= Yes, it can, especially with the help of embryo rescue technique. Many
slipper orchid species with different chromosome number yielded a number of
interspecific hybrids, both primary and complex ones.
Can a 2n = 40 plant produce viable seed with its own diploid?
= Yes, it can, especially 2n = 2N = 40 since it is diploid. However, the
fertility declines if it is tetraploid (2n = 4N).
How about with a plant in the same genus with a chromosome count of 2n = 46?
= It should be fertile.
3. What happens when a plant messes up and undergoes aneuploidy.
Aneuploidy is defined in the text as when some type of evolution takes place
where the offspring end up with a few extra chromosomes here and there. Doesn't
this mess up the plant? If not, why not?
= Normally, an aneuploidy has low fertility. However, a few offsprings of its
can regain the fertlity through chromosome doubling. In evolution process, the
fittest will survive and establish an population. If the aneuploidy can perform
better than the original in survival and reproduction in a new environment, it
may evolve to be a new species in a due course.
4. Similarly, there is a term called dysploidy where a few chromosomes don't
make it into the new plants, or where old chromosomes get pieces chewed off,
somehow. Don't plants need at least a portion of the information contained in
the chromosome arms? Doesn't this mess up the plant? If not, why not?
= Most of higher plants today are polyploid. It is hypothesized that plants
with N > 10 are eupolyploid. Missing a chromosome from eupolyploids may not be
lethal.
5. Can a plant that has experienced aneuploidy or dysploidy produce viable
seed with a normal-count plant? Or does the plant have to reproduce vegetatively
for a while until there is another receptive brother or
sister with whom to mate?
= As stated above, it is possible that aneuploid can produce some seeds.
6. How much messing around with chromosome numbers does it take before the
morphological differences are large enough to produce a new genus?
= It is not just the chromosome number. Reproduction organ and crossability are
the key different that separate two population to a genus level.
You may try look at chromosome number of the genus Aglaonema which varies within
the species and genus. The genus is vegetatively propagated in natural
condition.
I hope my answer can help you clear up your doubt.
Regards,
Surawit
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
|
|
From: ted.held at us.henkel.com (ted.held at us.henkel.com) on 2008.01.10 at 18:26:37(16942)
Dear Surawit,
Thank you for your reply. It looks like there is much information"out
there" about this science that has been hidden from me all these years. I
think I'll try Leland's advice as well, and think about what you have
written.
My response is humble and I have a number of new questions now that will
only add to my perplexity. Here are a few.
1. How reliable are chromosome counts, statistically? How many cells do
you need to count before you are satisfied that you have the right number?
2. Is it possible to have a nuisance cell or two that show a different
count from others from the same plant? I mean, what do you do if you
count, say 20 cells with 2n = 40 and one with 2n = 42?
3. How easy is it to break a chromosome in the process of performing the
preparation and root tip crush?
I'd better stop now.
Ted.
| +More |
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/private/aroid-l/attachments/20080110/11fc90ae/attachment.htm
|
|
From: agrsuw at ku.ac.th (agrsuw at ku.ac.th) on 2008.01.11 at 07:23:43(16944)
Dear Ted,
The following is my answer to your questions.
]
Quoting ted.held at us.henkel.com:
| +More |
> 1. How reliable are chromosome counts, statistically? How many cells do
> you need to count before you are satisfied that you have the right number?
= Some said that the count before 1970s should be recounted due to the old
technique was not good enough. In a normall count, we count from at least 5
good cells. "Good cell" means the cells that their chromosome spread out
clearly. These cell must have their cell wall intact. The number we finally
take is the number from the majority of the cell, not an average.
> 2. Is it possible to have a nuisance cell or two that show a different
> count from others from the same plant? I mean, what do you do if you
> count, say 20 cells with 2n = 40 and one with 2n = 42?
= Yes, it is possible that there are some cell with different chromosome number.
This phenomenon is called "cytochimera or mixoploidy". From your scenario, 2n
= 40 will be the count.
> 3. How easy is it to break a chromosome in the process of performing the
> preparation and root tip crush?
= It is extremly difficult to break a chromosome without crushing the cell
wall.
I am more than happy to entertain your curiosity.
Surawit
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
|
|
From: pjm at gol.com (Peter Matthews) on 2008.01.14 at 03:19:41(16950)
Dear Ted,
>1. How reliable are chromosome counts, statistically? How many cells do
>you need to count before you are satisfied that you have the right number?
Some kinds of plants are more stable than others, but many plants (like
Colocasia eesculenta - taro) are very stable - i.e. one clear count on
one cell from one tip is likely to be the full story. Ferns with
hundreds of tiny similar-looking chromosomes are hard to count
accurately, and may also be more unstable in terms of number.
>2. Is it possible to have a nuisance cell or two that show a different
>count from others from the same plant? I mean, what do you do if you
>count, say 20 cells with 2n = 40 and one with 2n = 42?
Count more cells, confirm, and report!
In my experience, this sort of thing is a reflection of poor preparations
with spilled chromosomes and difficult, inaccurate counting.
If the counts are all clear and accurate, and the unusual number is real,
then there could be some interest in counting many more cells to
establish a frequency of occurrence, and measure the instability in cell
divisions.
| +More |
Another way to get at this is to look at chromosome spreads from hundreds
of seedlings in an experimental breeding cross, to learn what the
natural frequency of aneupleoidy or polyploidy is.
Such insanely eye-straining work has actually been done for some plants
(including taro, Colocasia esculenta - by a Japanese research group). In
the case of taro, it was possible to use this approach experimentally to
confirm very low rates of polyploid formation by the rare production of
unreduced gametes.
I do not remember if aneuploids were also found.
>3. How easy is it to break a chromosome in the process of performing the
>preparation and root tip crush?
It is easier to break the cell membranes, and spill chromosomes across
the field of view on a slide - sometimes with the result that it is
unclear which cell the chromosome comes from.
The individual, fully-condensed chromosomes at metaphase are very
resilient in the cell solution, and under the pressures applied a slide
preparation, so they do not break.
Metaphase chromosomes are what we target, usually, when making chromosome
counts. Certain chemicals can be used to arrest cells at this stage in
cell division, in order to increase the chance of being able to make a
good count.
Best regards, Peter Matthews (Kyoto)
****
|
|
Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.
|
|