Philodendron ID confinmation needed

From: "Marek Argent" <abri1973 at wp.pl> on 2011.01.12 at 13:05:45(21727) Dear Friends, I got photos of two Philodendron spp. from an aroider from Australia One plant is 028, 029, 030 - can it be Ph. goeldii? Second one 038, 039, 040 - a juvenile Ph. radiatum or rathet Ph. xanadu or? Please help, Marek Argent HTML +More ------=_NextPart_001_007E_01CBB261.CF332B00-- ------=_NextPart_000_007D_01CBB261.CF2F5A70

From: raymomattla at cs.com on 2011.01.12 at 17:37:59(21730) The first ones look like syngonium sp. Sent on the Sprint� Now Network from my BlackBerry� -----Original Message----- +More From: "Marek Argent" Sender: aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:05:45 To: discussion of aroids; Tom Croat Reply-To: Discussion of aroids Subject: [Aroid-l] Philodendron ID confinmation needed _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l

From: Scherberich <aroids at numericable.fr> on 2011.01.12 at 18:35:10(21733) Hello Marek, Pictures 28-29-30 is a Syngonium species, probably Syngonium auritum ... Pictures 38-39-40 could indeed represent Philodendron radiatum (elongate internodes exclude P. xanadu). With best regards, David HTML +More Le 12 janv. 11 � 14:05, Marek Argent a �crit : Dear Friends, I got photos of two Philodendron spp. from an aroider from Australia One plant is 028, 029, 030 - can it be Ph. goeldii? Second one 038, 039, 040 - a juvenile Ph. radiatum or rathet Ph. xanadu or? Please help, Marek Argent_______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l David SCHERBERICH Email: aroids@numericable.fr http://www.aroidpictures.fr --Apple-Mail-4-870014333-- --==============24040296696008883=

From: =?utf-8?Q?Genevi=C3=A8ve_Ferry?= <jpcferry2 at wanadoo.fr> on 2011.01.12 at 19:39:36(21736) Dear Marek, It’s not Philodendron goeldii . It’s a Syngonium ? The best , Geneviève Ferry HTML +More From: Marek Argent Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 2:05 PM To: discussion of aroids ; title=Thomas.Croat@mobot.org href="mailto:Thomas.Croat@mobot.org">Tom Croat Subject: [Aroid-l] Philodendron ID confinmation needed Dear Friends, I got photos of two Philodendron spp. from an aroider from Australia One plant is 028, 029, 030 - can it be Ph. goeldii? Second one 038, 039, 040 - a juvenile Ph. radiatum or rathet Ph. xanadu or? Please help, Marek Argent _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l ------=_NextPart_000_007E_01CBB298.D3BA82E0-- --==============�02060497470802303=

From: Peter Boyce <phymatarum at googlemail.com> on 2011.01.13 at 00:16:36(21738) Looks like Syngonium auritum. An easy way to tell is to tear a leaf - the sap of Syngonium is milky whereas the sap od almost all Philodendrons, and certainly those with compound leaf blades, is clear, resionius and aromatic. Peter HTML +More 2011/1/13 Genevi�ve Ferry Dear Marek, It�s not Philodendron goeldii . It�s a Syngonium ? The best , Genevi�ve Ferry From: Marek Argent Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 2:05 PM To: discussion of aroids ; Tom Croat Subject: [Aroid-l] Philodendron ID confinmation needed Dear Friends, I got photos of two Philodendron spp. from an aroider from Australia One plant is 028, 029, 030 - can it be Ph. goeldii? Second one 038, 039, 040 - a juvenile Ph. radiatum or rathet Ph. xanadu or? Please help, Marek Argent _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l --0016e644cac01a91c90499af3b8d-- --==============�87769581556700165=

Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.