Aroid systematics

From: "Marek Argent" <abri1973 at wp.pl> on 2010.01.14 at 23:11:04(20473) Hello everyone, I've made a page on the systematics of Araceae. Could you check it if there are no errors? I don't know if the names of subfamilies Zamioculcadoideae Gymnostachydoideae are correct. HTML +More When it's error free I will make also a printable version in pdf http://www.wschowa.com/abrimaal/araceum/pages/sys.htm Best, Marek Argent ------=_NextPart_000_0168_01CA9577.3A3466C0----==============&30717010613142213=

From: "Marek Argent" <abri1973 at wp.pl> on 2010.02.24 at 15:35:58(20656) Hello, In my site there's a page with Araceae systematics, http://www.wschowa.com/abrimaal/araceum/pages/sys.htm I think it is out of date. Today I read a document from 2008 http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/reprint/95/12/1569.pdf and I found there that the subfamily Monsteroideae is now tribes Monstereae and Spathiphylleae within the subfamily Pothoideae. Philodendron is not in Aroideae, but in it's own subfamily Philodendroideae (with tribes Philodendreae, Montrichardieae and I don't know what else). Maybe Homalomeneae too? Can anyone confirm this is true? Where can I find an up to date systematics? Please help, Marek +More ------=_NextPart_000_0058_01CAB56F.71DBFBC0 _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l --==============‰03553158347118883==--

From: "Marek Argent" <abri1973 at wp.pl> on 2010.02.24 at 15:35:58(20657) Hello, In my site there's a page with Araceae systematics, http://www..wschowa.com/abrimaal/araceum/pages/sys.htm I think it is out of date. Today I read a document from 2008 http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/reprint/95/12/1569.pdf and I found there that the subfamily Monsteroideae is now tribes Monstereae and Spathiphylleae within the subfamily Pothoideae. Philodendron is not in Aroideae, but in it's own subfamily Philodendroideae (with tribes Philodendreae, Montrichardieae and I don't know what else). Maybe Homalomeneae too? Can anyone confirm this is true? Where can I find an up to date systematics? Please help, Marek HTML +More ------=_NextPart_000_0058_01CAB56F.71DBFBC0----==============‰03553158347118883=

From: "Marek Argent" <abri1973 at wp.pl> on 2010.02.25 at 14:38:53(20667) Hello again. I think I'm answering to myself: Another document I've found shows the cladogram I know. http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/reprint/95/9/1153.pdf Marek +More ----- Original Message ----- From: Marek Argent To: discussion of aroids Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 4:35 PM Subject: [Aroid-l] Aroid systematics Hello, In my site there's a page with Araceae systematics, http://www.wschowa.com/abrimaal/araceum/pages/sys.htm I think it is out of date. Today I read a document from 2008 http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/reprint/95/12/1569.pdf and I found there that the subfamily Monsteroideae is now tribes Monstereae and Spathiphylleae within the subfamily Pothoideae. Philodendron is not in Aroideae, but in it's own subfamily Philodendroideae (with tribes Philodendreae, Montrichardieae and I don't know what else). Maybe Homalomeneae too? Can anyone confirm this is true? Where can I find an up to date systematics? Please help, Marek ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Nie znaleziono virusa w tej wiadomo¶ci przychodz±cej. Sprawdzone przez AVG - www.avg.com Wersja: 8.5.435 / Baza danych wirusów: 271.1.1/2707 - Data wydania: 02/24/10 07:34:00 ------=_NextPart_000_00EA_01CAB630.A2CB0520 _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l --==============782719047762974415==--

From: "Marek Argent" <abri1973 at wp.pl> on 2010.02.25 at 14:38:53(20668) Hello again. I think I'm answering to myself: Another document I've found shows the cladogram I know. http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/reprint/95/9/1153.pdf Marek HTML +More ----- Original Message ----- From: Marek Argent To: discussion of aroids Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 4:35 PM Subject: [Aroid-l] Aroid systematics Hello, In my site there's a page with Araceae systematics, http://www..wschowa.com/abrimaal/araceum/pages/sys.htm I think it is out of date. Today I read a document from 2008 http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/reprint/95/12/1569.pdf and I found there that the subfamily Monsteroideae is now tribes Monstereae and Spathiphylleae within the subfamily Pothoideae. Philodendron is not in Aroideae, but in it's own subfamily Philodendroideae (with tribes Philodendreae, Montrichardieae and I don't know what else). Maybe Homalomeneae too? Can anyone confirm this is true? Where can I find an up to date systematics? Please help, Marek _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l Nie znaleziono virusa w tej wiadomo¶ci przychodz±cej. Sprawdzone przez AVG - www.avg.com Wersja: 8.5.435 / Baza danych wirusów: 271.1.1/2707 - Data wydania: 02/24/10 07:34:00 ------=_NextPart_000_00EA_01CAB630.A2CB0520----==============782719047762974415=

Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.