IAS on Facebook
IAS on Instagram
|
IAS Aroid Quasi Forum
About Aroid-L
This is a continuously updated archive of the Aroid-L mailing list in a forum format - not an actual Forum. If you want to post, you will still need to register for the Aroid-L mailing list and send your postings by e-mail for moderation in the normal way.
Tacca questions (off topic??)
|
From: "Randall M. Story" story at caltech.edu> on 2002.05.24 at 19:27:27(8874)
Hi,
I'm looking for information about Tacca plantaginea (Schizocapsa
plantaginea?). I get the impression that Tacca used to be considered an
Aroid, but not anymore (please correct me if I am wrong). Anyway, I picked
up a small seedling of this plant (~3 inch diameter) at last weekend's
Huntington Botanical Garden (near Los Angeles) plant sale. I have been able
to find little information about this species and I am curious: How do I
grow it? (warm and humid? light level?). Does it look like other Taccas
(i.e. chantrieri). How long will it take my little plant to reach blooming
size?
| +More |
It sounds like the history of the classification of this genus is quite
interesting. I read that at least one species used to be considered closely
related to Amorphophallus (e.g. Dewey Fisk's site)!
Thanks
Randy
Pasadena, California (USDA zone 10/Sunset zone 21, 2 miles from the
Huntington)
|
|
From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid" hetter at worldonline.nl> on 2002.05.26 at 18:50:48(8881)
Tacca plantaginea is a small version of, say Tacca chantrieri but it has
less dramatically coloured inflorescences. They are basically a pale
greenish. There is a fair plant growing in Leiden, kept warm and humid
indeed. That's all I can say of this species. Oh, yes, it used to be
separated from Tacca in the genus Schizocapsa but that is no longer
followed.
| +More |
Tacca: The Dutch botanist Rumphius presented Tacca sativa and Tacca
phallifera in 1747. Tacca sativa was presented as a plate with only a leaf
but the description clearly indicates this is Am. paeoniifolius. Rumphius
never saw the inflorescence of this but he describes that if the plant is
left alone in a garden it will produce fruits on a long stalk. Tacca
phallifera is a plate in which both a REAL Tacca is seen (T.
leontopetaloides, incl. an inflorescence) and an isolated inflorescence of
Am. paeoniifolius. Rumphius says the plant was brought from the mountains
and first produces a "fungus" (= the paeoniifolius inflorescence) and later
it produces the "Tacca" (the leaf). The whole affair is strange as the
description of Tacca phallifera is all about A. paeoniifolius whereas the
drawing clearly shows the mix with T. leontopetaloides.
Generally the reason why present-day Tacca and Amorphs have been associated
is the general similarity of the leaf of the weedy Tacca leontopetaloides
with Amorphophallus. The people on Ambon (the island where Rumphius resided
and where he wrote his "Herbarium Amboinensis" books) called these
umbrella-like leaves generically "Tacca". So that's why Rumphius also used
that word, which later became the name of the genus Tacca and which was
restricted by botanists to include only the real Tacca species as we know
them today. The confusion thus was created by the coincidence that Tacca
leontopetaloides was growing on an island together with Am. paeoniifolius
and both have similar leaves.
Thus endeth this sunday lecture for all you to enjoy (or delete..........).
Lord P.
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: aroid-l@mobot.org [mailto:aroid-l@mobot.org]Namens
> Randall M. Story
> Verzonden: vrijdag 24 mei 2002 21:26
> Aan: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
> Onderwerp: Tacca questions (off topic??)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for information about Tacca plantaginea (Schizocapsa
> plantaginea?). I get the impression that Tacca used to be
> considered an
> Aroid, but not anymore (please correct me if I am wrong).
> Anyway, I picked
> up a small seedling of this plant (~3 inch diameter) at last weekend's
> Huntington Botanical Garden (near Los Angeles) plant sale. I
> have been able
> to find little information about this species and I am
> curious: How do I
> grow it? (warm and humid? light level?). Does it look like
> other Taccas
> (i.e. chantrieri). How long will it take my little plant to
> reach blooming
> size?
>
> It sounds like the history of the classification of this
> genus is quite
> interesting. I read that at least one species used to be
> considered closely
> related to Amorphophallus (e.g. Dewey Fisk's site)!
>
> Thanks
>
> Randy
> Pasadena, California (USDA zone 10/Sunset zone 21, 2 miles from the
> Huntington)
>
|
|
From: StroWi at t-online.de (StroWi) on 2002.05.27 at 02:58:13(8885)
> ........
> Thus endeth this sunday lecture for all you to enjoy (or delete.........).
>
> Lord P.
Dear Lord P.,
I did NOT delete it and (mostly ;-)) enjoy our Lord's contributions and I have further questions.
I grow a Tacca chantrieri since a few weeks ago. Here in Germany these plants are seen now and then in good garden centres and sold for remarkable prices, around 40 Euro/US$. However, when the inflorescens starts to wilt and is cut, the plant looks like a huge boring Spathiphyllum (excuse me Ron ;-) and is often sold for 1/2 or 1/4 of the former price.
The plants marketed here in Germany by www.Tacca.de are cloned in vitro since no seeds set was reached so far (as far as I know...). It is said that the donor plant is male sterile, however, I do not have any proof of this.
Is male strelility known in Tacca (chantrieri) or could it be a self incompatibility mechanism as well?
Speaking against the latter is the observation of a list member whose single T. chantrieri sets seed (or does the neighbour grow a different genotype???) However, the seeds I got did not germinate yet after months; but that seems to be a pain in the ...(O.K. some where further down) with Tacca germination anyway.
My second question regarding Tacca spec. is, if they can be traded as bare root tubers/rhizomes or if they are? If this is possible, would anyone know a source?
And last but not least, which Tacca spec. are edible? This, of course, aims at the question of the common name and the availibility in asian food stores.
Any comment most welcome!
Bernhard.
| +More |
--
Bernhard.
Germany, approx. zone 6
|
|
From: Steve Marak samarak at arachne.uark.edu> on 2002.05.27 at 05:30:43(8886)
On Sun, 26 May 2002, StroWi wrote:
> The plants marketed here in Germany by www.Tacca.de are cloned in
> vitro since no seeds set was reached so far (as far as I know...). It
> is said that the donor plant is male sterile, however, I do not have
> any proof of this. Is male strelility known in Tacca (chantrieri) or
> could it be a self incompatibility mechanism as well?
>
> Speaking against the latter is the observation of a list member whose
> single T. chantrieri sets seed (or does the neighbour grow a different
> genotype???) However, the seeds I got did not germinate yet after
> months; but that seems to be a pain in the ...(O.K. some where further
> down) with Tacca germination anyway.
There used to be an Aroid-L'er from New Orleans, Lousiana, here in the US,
who I met through Phil Mueller. He had Tacca chantrieri seedlings coming
up all over his yard - I think he actually mowed the unwanted ones, which
horrified me.
Phil sent me several of the seedlings, which I promptly killed, then sent
me a couple more, which I killed more slowly. In both cases, I apparently
failed to keep them wet enough - I was told that I should pot them in
"Mississippi mud" (heavy, poorly aerated soil that reminds me of black
clay) and keep them WET! If I manage to get another, I will.
Steve
| +More |
-- Steve Marak
-- samarak@arachne.uark.edu
|
|
From: "Michael Pascall" mickpascall at hotmail.com> on 2002.05.27 at 05:32:29(8887)
Taccas will set seed , but you must let it ripen fully.
We get seed on the black all the time .
The white one can be a bit difficult as the seedlings seem to be very
delicate and 10% survival is considered lucky .
The small Tacca palmata forms a tuber and can be sent bare root when
dormant, but the others resent bare rooting , though may survive if kept
well wrapped in Sphagnum .
Michael Pascall,
WHYANBEEL ARBORETUM,F.N.Q,AUSTRALIA
| +More |
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
|
|
From: StroWi at t-online.de (StroWi) on 2002.05.27 at 16:08:00(8889)
Dear Michael Pascall,
thanks for your answer.
Concerning the seed set of T. chantrieri it would be of interest, if you grow a population of different genotypes or if you really get seedset after self pollination. The latter would, of course, speak against selfincompatibility and pro the male sterile status of the clone offered over here in Germany.
Best,
Bernhard.
| +More |
Dollbergen, Germany
aprrox. zone 6
"Michael Pascall" schrieb:
> Taccas will set seed , but you must let it ripen fully.
> We get seed on the black all the time .
> The white one can be a bit difficult as the seedlings seem to be very
> delicate and 10% survival is considered lucky .
> The small Tacca palmata forms a tuber and can be sent bare root when
> dormant, but the others resent bare rooting , though may survive if kept
> well wrapped in Sphagnum .
>
>
> Michael Pascall,
> WHYANBEEL ARBORETUM,F.N.Q,AUSTRALIA
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com
|
|
From: StroWi at t-online.de (StroWi) on 2002.05.27 at 16:11:03(8891)
Steve,
thanks for the response.
"Steve Marak" schrieb:
| +More |
> On Sun, 26 May 2002, StroWi wrote:
> There used to be an Aroid-L'er from New Orleans, Lousiana, here in the US,
> who I met through Phil Mueller. He had Tacca chantrieri seedlings coming
> up all over his yard - I think he actually mowed the unwanted ones, which
> horrified me.
Oh yes, hat would have horified me, too. Really strange that weeds from the one place are the plant gems in another....
>
> Phil sent me several of the seedlings, which I promptly killed, then sent
> me a couple more, which I killed more slowly. In both cases, I apparently
> failed to keep them wet enough - I was told that I should pot them in
> "Mississippi mud" (heavy, poorly aerated soil that reminds me of black
> clay) and keep them WET!
The high water requirement is true for my adult plant as well. When I look a little too late and find the substrate still moist, at least in a state that other species with a similar foliage would not care about, my Tacca started to wilt with all leafes bending to the ground. However, by watering it recovers, maybe gets some dried leaf tips.
Low air humidity seems to be tolerated more; the plant is cultured in my living room, although it would probably benefit from high air humidity.
If it will flower under home conditions I do not know yet.
Best,
Bernhard.
Dollbergen, Germany
approx. zone 6
|
|
From: "Ron Iles" roniles at eircom.net> on 2002.05.27 at 16:12:34(8892)
Bernhard (Mr. Strowi) wrote...
I .....enjoy our Lord's contributions.....
>>>>>>>>>(In
| +More |
unison?)Indeed, what would the Line be without HIM?
The Lord be praised - Pax
vobiscum.
However, when the...(Tacca
chantieri)....inflorescens starts to wilt and is cut, the plant looks like a
huge boring Spathiphyllum (excuse me Ron....
>>>>>>>>>>>Now that IS boring! Is
it an aquatic species?
R
|
|
From: "Harry Witmore" harrywitmore at witmore.net> on 2002.05.27 at 16:14:06(8893)
My Tacca chantrieri sets seeds. I have had some success getting them to
germinate. It seems to take forever for the pods to ripen. Out of the 8 or
so seedlings I have only a few seem to grow readily even though they are all
being grown the same. They like to be wet but mine don't seem to like
standing in water.
Harry Witmore
| +More |
Cloud Jungle Art
www.witmore.net
-----Original Message-----
Marak
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 1:31 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
Subject: RE: Tacca questions (off topic??)
On Sun, 26 May 2002, StroWi wrote:
> The plants marketed here in Germany by www.Tacca.de are cloned in
> vitro since no seeds set was reached so far (as far as I know...). It
> is said that the donor plant is male sterile, however, I do not have
> any proof of this. Is male strelility known in Tacca (chantrieri) or
> could it be a self incompatibility mechanism as well?
>
> Speaking against the latter is the observation of a list member whose
> single T. chantrieri sets seed (or does the neighbour grow a different
> genotype???) However, the seeds I got did not germinate yet after
> months; but that seems to be a pain in the ...(O.K. some where further
> down) with Tacca germination anyway.
There used to be an Aroid-L'er from New Orleans, Lousiana, here in the US,
who I met through Phil Mueller. He had Tacca chantrieri seedlings coming
up all over his yard - I think he actually mowed the unwanted ones, which
horrified me.
Phil sent me several of the seedlings, which I promptly killed, then sent
me a couple more, which I killed more slowly. In both cases, I apparently
failed to keep them wet enough - I was told that I should pot them in
"Mississippi mud" (heavy, poorly aerated soil that reminds me of black
clay) and keep them WET! If I manage to get another, I will.
Steve
-- Steve Marak
-- samarak@arachne.uark.edu
|
|
From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid" hetter at worldonline.nl> on 2002.05.27 at 16:16:01(8894)
Before
I end up a Taccophile, here are my last words:
The
website www.tacca.de says there is a patent
granted in Europe on Tacca. Unfortunately it isn't clear whther the black Tacca
is meant or the soon-to-be-released white one. I do know that two black Tacca's
have been garnted Plant Breeder's Rights in Europe (which is NOT the same as a
plant patent but the website builders may have made a serious mistake here).
These Tacca's had been refused before on the grounds of not being uniform
enough, which is why they are now multiplied in tissue-culture. I seem to recall
that the resultant plant that got the PBR is in fact a hybrid cultivar (it's
annoying that the website does not produce the cultivar name), which may explain
its unwillingness to seed. So there is a chance we are not talking simple Tacca
chantrieri here.
The
Plantscope database (www.plantscope.nl)
presents two Tacca cultivars, T. chantrieri 'Aameyri' (European PBR filenumber
00/0628) and T. chantrieri 'Lentac'. Whether these do belong to chantrieri is
doubtful. 'Aameyri' has a rather small inflorescence with the bracts purple
flushed green. In the files of the Euopean PBR office, the cultivar is
classified directly under Tacca and not as Tacca chantrieri. The owner is Dutch.
The white Tacca is owned by a German company.
T.
leontopetaloides is edible.
So
much for Tacca.
Cheerio,
Wilbert
| +More |
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----Van: aroid-l@mobot.org
[mailto:aroid-l@mobot.org]Namens StroWiVerzonden: maandag 27
mei 2002 4:57Aan: Multiple recipients of list
AROID-LOnderwerp: RE: Tacca questions (off
topic??)> .......
> Thus endeth this sunday
lecture for all you to enjoy (or delete.........). > >
Lord P. Dear Lord P.,
I did NOT delete it and (mostly
;-)) enjoy our Lord's contributions and I have further questions.
I grow a Tacca chantrieri since
a few weeks ago. Here in Germany these plants are seen now and then in good
garden centres and sold for remarkable prices, around 40 Euro/US$. However,
when the inflorescens starts to wilt and is cut, the plant looks like a huge
boring Spathiphyllum (excuse me Ron ;-) and is often sold for 1/2 or 1/4 of
the former price. The plants
marketed here in Germany by www.Tacca.de are cloned in vitro since no seeds
set was reached so far (as far as I know...). It is said that the donor plant
is male sterile, however, I do not have any proof of this. Is male strelility known in Tacca (chantrieri) or
could it be a self incompatibility mechanism as well? Speaking against the latter is the observation of a
list member whose single T. chantrieri sets seed (or does the neighbour grow a
different genotype???) However, the seeds I got did not germinate yet after
months; but that seems to be a pain in the ...(O.K. some where further down)
with Tacca germination anyway. My second question regarding Tacca spec. is, if they can be traded as
bare root tubers/rhizomes or if they are? If this is possible, would anyone
know a source? And last but not
least, which Tacca spec. are edible? This, of course, aims at the question of
the common name and the availibility in asian food stores.
Any comment most welcome!
Bernhard. -- Bernhard. Germany, approx.
zone 6
|
|
From: Dyeingduk at aol.com on 2002.05.27 at 21:19:12(8895)
I have the black Tacca and it does seem to take forever for the fruit to ripen. What i do is just put a pot of some sort of soiless mix under the pods. As they mature and basically rot away the seed begins to grow in the pots. I don't know my germination percentages because i have never taken a coun, but from say 3 or 4 fruit, i get a pretty full 4" pot. The problems come when repotting. It seems a lot of them just melt away. Thats been my only experiences with Tacca.
Paul Marcellini
| |
|
From: "Patricia Frank" tricia_frank at hotmail.com> on 2002.05.28 at 01:28:36(8900)
Hoe do you know when they are ripe? Tricia | +More | ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Pascall Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 1:39 AM To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L Subject: RE: Tacca questions (off topic??) Taccas will set seed , but you must let it ripen fully.We get seed on the black all the time .The white one can be a bit difficult as the seedlings seem to be verydelicate and 10% survival is considered lucky .The small Tacca palmata forms a tuber and can be sent bare root whendormant, but the others resent bare rooting , though may survive if keptwell wrapped in Sphagnum .Michael Pascall,WHYANBEEL ARBORETUM,F.N.Q,AUSTRALIA_________________________________________________________________Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.http://www.hotmail.com
|
|
From: "Michael Pascall" mickpascall at hotmail.com> on 2002.05.28 at 16:12:59(8906)
Patricia , when the seed pod starts to get a bit soft and mushy its ripe .
Michael Pascall,
WHYANBEEL ARBORETUM,F.N.Q,AUSTRALIA
| +More |
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
|
|
Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.
|
|