<LOGIN> <REGISTER>
SOCIETY
MEMBERS
CONTACT US
JOIN/RENEW
SHOW
CHAPTERS
AROID-L
AROIDERS
AROIDS
FLORAS
GENERA
GALLERY
POLLINATION
LINKS
HORTICULTURE
CULTIVARS
TRADING POST
ID CENTER
HORT LINKS
LITERATURE
AROIDEANA
NEWSLETTER
 



 IAS on Facebook
 IAS on Instagram

IAS Aroid Quasi Forum
About Aroid-L
 This is a continuously updated archive of the Aroid-L mailing list in a forum format - not an actual Forum. If you want to post, you will still need to register for the Aroid-L mailing list and send your postings by e-mail for moderation in the normal way.

  ID help
From: Don Martinson llmen at execpc.com> on 2000.08.24 at 01:55:50(5301)
A friend sent me the following photo of an infructesence from a
recently purchased plant.

http://www.execpc.com/~llmen/pod.jpg

Unfortunately, she does not as yet have a photo of the plant itself,
but from her description, it sounds similar to one of the birdsnest
anthuriums and one that might be commonly available.

I'll try to get a photo of the plant itself, but in the meantime, any guesses?
--
Don Martinson

+More
From: "Don Bittel" dbittel at treco.net> on 2000.08.24 at 04:42:55(5302)
From the picture of the infructescence, this could be almost any one of
the birdnest anthuriums which have red berries, which means it is more
likely from Central America or Mexico than South America. Too many
possibilities to guess without a leaf or overall photo.
But it could easily be Anth. schlechtendalii, which is probably the most
common birdnest in cultivation in Florida.

Don Bittel

+More
From: plantnut at macconnect.com (plantnut) on 2000.08.24 at 04:44:38(5303)
Definitely Anthurium and most probably Section Pachyneurium. See Dr.
Croat's book.... "A Revision of Anthurium Section Pachyneurium". He says
there are 114 species in this section.... as of the publishing
date..(1991). since then... God only knbows how many more... so... take
your pick..
+More
From: Piabinha at aol.com on 2000.08.25 at 03:07:23(5305)
> >http://www.execpc.com/~llmen/pod.jpg

something very similar was in fruit at the brooklyn botanic garden last week.

also several watermaliense in fruit too.

tsuh yang chen, nyc, USA

From: Don Martinson llmen at wi.rr.com> on 2005.05.30 at 04:29:29(12971)
Below are links to photos of an Arisaema which appeared in a pot of
Typhoniums last year. The spathe is rather stubby, not much more
than 1 inch (2.54cm) in height. Actually, it resembles A. flavum,
but is certainly not very yellow.

Any guesses?

http://home.wi.rr.com/llmen/unkarisaema3a.jpg

http://home.wi.rr.com/llmen/unkarisaema4.jpg

--
Don Martinson

+More
From: Robert Hamilton robhamilton at trump.net.au> on 2005.05.30 at 06:00:23(12972)
Hi Don,

On 30/05/2005, at 2:29 PM, Don Martinson wrote:

Below are links to photos of an Arisaema which appeared in a pot of
Typhoniums last year. The spathe is rather stubby, not much more than
1 inch (2.54cm) in height. Actually, it resembles A. flavum, but is
certainly not very yellow.

I thinks its Arisaema flavum var abbreviatum.

Cheers,

Rob in Tasmania

+More
From: "Abrimaal Svartvinter" abrimaal at o2.pl> on 2005.05.30 at 08:48:47(12973)
Hello,

You're right, this is Ariseema. However I'm NOT allowed to post in the ID
Cener photos other than taken by yourself

Greetings

+More
From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid" hetter at xs4all.nl> on 2005.05.30 at 13:52:28(12974)
It is certainly a flavum but not too "flavus" at all.

Cheerio,
Wilbert

+More
From: Ken Mosher ken at spatulacity.com> on 2006.02.11 at 02:47:14(13846)
Aroiders,

I've had a request to help ID this bulb. The requester thought it was an
aroid, which I seem to doubt (are there any aroids that are true bulbs?).

I'm not sure if the two attached photos will come through to the list.
If not then anyone willing to try an ID can email me *privately*
(please) and I'll resend the photos directly to you.

(My impression is Eucomis sp)

-Ken Mosher

+More
From: Thomas.Croat at mobot.org on 2006.02.11 at 02:55:19(13847)
Title: RE: [Aroid-l] ID help

Ken: This is not an aroid.

Tom

+More
From: Brian Williams pugturd at alltel.net> on 2006.02.11 at 03:01:53(13849)
It is a pineapple lily Eucomis.
_______________________________________________
Aroid-l mailing list
+More
From: "Alan Galloway" alan_galloway at bellsouth.net> on 2006.02.11 at 03:06:03(13850)
Ken,

It could possibly be a Haemanthus bulb.

Alan

+More
From: Susan B honeybunny442 at yahoo.com> on 2006.02.11 at 03:10:09(13851)
oh, I've seen that one before... Scadoxus? some Allium?Ken Mosher wrote: Aroiders,I've had a request to help ID this bulb. The requester thought it was anaroid, which I seem to doubt (are there any aroids that are true bulbs?).
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail._______________________________________________
+More
From: "?goston J?nos" agoston.janos at citromail.hu> on 2006.02.11 at 06:18:07(13857)
This is Scadoxus multiflorus subsp.
multiflorus

----- Original Message -----

+More
From: "?goston J?nos" agoston.janos at citromail.hu> on 2006.02.11 at 06:23:51(13858)
This and other plants (~2565 species and varieties)
will be on my homepage (http://viraghagymasz.davidnet.hu) by
febr. 15. (I hope). Sorry, most of the text is in
Hungarian!
+More
From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid" hetter at xs4all.nl> on 2006.02.11 at 08:03:58(13860)
Ken, it is surely a Scadoxus and almost certainly S. multiflorus.

Cheerio,
Wilbert

+More
From: "Andy Cabe" acabe at riverbanks.org> on 2006.02.11 at 12:44:47(13863)
Eucomis is a good guess. It may also be a scilla or drimiopsis.

________________________________

Sent: Fri 2/10/2006 9:47 PM

+More
From: "Derek Burch" derek at horticulturist.com> on 2006.02.11 at 22:01:15(13869)
My vote would go to the person who suggested Scadoxus - that used to be
Haemanthus. .More specifically I think it is probably Scadoxus multiflorus
katherinae. All of my bulbs of this have that spotted look on glossy green
- more so than Eucomis or Drimiopsis. Derek

+More
From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid" hetter at xs4all.nl> on 2006.02.12 at 05:46:04(13872)
I sugegsted S. multiforus indeed but I do not agree with reason for the
infraspecific katharinae suggestion: S. multiflorus ssp. katharinae differs
from the typical subspecies and subsp. longitubus exclusively in sizes of a
number of floral characters. The spots on the "pseudo"-bulb are present in
the entire species.

Cheerio,
Wilbert

+More
From: "Derek Burch" derek at horticulturist.com> on 2006.02.12 at 21:09:17(13874)
I will certainly bow to you Wilbert - good to know. I think that all mine
have come from a single plant, and I did not have a guaranteed id. on that
one in the first plac. If you know a lot about these creatures, why do you
waste greenhouse space on stinking aroids? Derek

+More
From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid" hetter at xs4all.nl> on 2006.02.17 at 10:42:56(13882)
Plants that don't stink, don't live...!!!!

Wilbert

+More
From: "?goston J?nos" agoston.janos at citromail.hu> on 2006.02.18 at 21:45:35(13884)
Yes, the others are called
"bulbs"...etc.
Real plants stinks!!!

+More
From: Don Martinson <LLmen at wi.rr.com> on 2007.06.29 at 21:35:52(15907)
Title: ID help

One of my pet peeves about out local conservatory is that there are so many plants
which are unlabeled.

Can anyone help ID the plant shown in the link below? The berries seem aroid-esque, but
I don’t know about the leaves. Yes, I know, a flower would have been so much better for ID, but....

http://home.wi.rr.com/llmen/unk2a.jpg

Thanks,

Don Martinson

+More
From: "Derek Burch" <derek at horticulturist.com> on 2007.07.02 at 02:27:23(15910)
Title: ID help

Don,

It looks like Palisota barteri, a member of the
Commelinaceae.

Derek

+More
From: Adam Black <epiphyte1 at earthlink.net> on 2007.07.02 at 02:34:24(15911)
Don,

Looks like Palisota barteri - family Commelinaceae

Adam

+More
From: Geoffrey Kibby <fieldmycol at yahoo.co.uk> on 2007.07.02 at 07:05:58(15914)
Dear Don,This is almost certainly a Palisota sp. a genus of the Family Commelinaceae which includes the better known plants Tradescantia. Leaves and berries can be quite decorative. They are mostly sub-tropical to tropical.Regards,Geoffrey KibbyLondonOn 29 Jun 2007, at 22:35, Don Martinson wrote: One of my pet peeves about out local conservatory is that there are so many plants which are unlabeled. Can anyone help ID the plant shown in the link below? The berries seem aroid-esque, but I don’t know about the leaves. Yes, I know, a flower would have been so much better for ID, but.... http://home.wi.rr.com/llmen/unk2a.jpg Thanks, Don Martinson Milwaukee, Wisconsin Mailto:llmen@wi.rr.com _______________________________________________Aroid-L mailing listAroid-L@www.gizmoworks.comhttp://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l _______________________________________________
Aroid-L mailing list
Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
+More
From: Don Martinson <LLmen at wi.rr.com> on 2007.07.02 at 17:08:01(15917)
Title: Re: [Aroid-l] ID help

Thank you, Geoffrey.

Don

+More
Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.

   
All Images and Text © 1996 to 2024 by the International Aroid Society or by their respective owners as noted.
Please send your comments to . We now have a Privacy Policy.Last updated: 18 FEB 2021
served by aws-web2