Re: [Aroid-l] Colocasia antiquorum

From: Peter Boyce <phymatarum at gmail.com> on 2014.09.09 at 03:06:54 George, Yes, correct. Sadly, no reference as yet - Bogner is working on this! Peter On 3 September 2014 15:29, George Yao <geoyao@gmail.com> wrote: Peter, Thanks for the info! So=C2=A0Colocasia esculenta var. antiquorum=C2=A0(Schott) Hubb. & Rehder and=C2=A0Colocasia=C2=A0antiquorum=C2=A0Schott are now Colocasia fontanesii Schott, am I right? If so, where can I find the reference? George Yao Metro-Manila Philippines On Sep 3, 2014, at 6:28 AM, Peter Boyce <phymatarum@gmail.com> wrote: Hi George, I think Steve may have got the wrong end of the stick - the problem isn't so much that antiquorum is a unique species but that it cannot be used as the name for aunique species - he next available name for which is fontanesii.=C2=A0 Peter On 2 September 2014 13:30, George Yao <geoyao@gmail.com> wrote: Hello Aroiders, In his webpage on Colocasia esculenta in his "The=C2=A0Exotic Rainforest" website, the late Steve Lucas pointed out that "A new paper is now in the process of being published that will establish that=C2=A0Colocasia antiquorum=C2=A0is a unique species.=E2=80=9D Has the mentioned paper been published yet? George Yao Metro-Manila Philippines _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l --001a11c3672445dfa10502993a74-- --===============7785544986912875371==

Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.