Arum was the other one.
Date: Sat=2C 19 Nov 2011 22:47:26 -0600
From: Thomas.Croat@mobot.org
To: aroid-l@www.gizmoworks.com
Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Araceae Juss. 1789
Dear Marak: =3B I believfe that Linnaeus
did recognize the Araceae but he recognized only 4 genera=2C as I recall they
were Pothos=2C Dracontium and Calla plus one other genus. The genera were very
artificial and later Schott and others added many more genera=2C like
Anthurium. =3B All the earliest Anthurium species were described in Pothos.
 =3B
Tom
 =3B
From:
aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com [mailto:aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com] On Behalf Of Marek Argent
Sent: Friday=2C November 18=2C 2011
6:48 PM
To: discussion of aroids
Subject: [Aroid-l] Araceae Juss.
1789
 =3B
This was always a question for me and I've never tried to
find the answer so far.
If the family name Araceae was stated in 1789=2C in
what family did Linnaeus place the aroids?
_______________________________________________
Aroid-L mailing list
Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l