Dear Steve”
I don’t know how the Philodendronvariifolium plant got confused with P. brandtianaum. I have a photographof drawing in my files of Poeppig 1281 or 1781 (I can’t read it well) andit is totally different. While it resembles the plant that is on thetropicos website I know that it is different because I have seen lots ofmaterial that has leaves like this from that general area. It seems to me thatthis same plant was one of 2 or 3 collections with a Poeppig number part of whichwas P. deflexum.
Tom
From: aroid-l-bounces@gizmoworks.com [mailto:aroid-l-bounces@gizmoworks.com]On Behalf Of John Criswick
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 20094:26 AM
To: 'Discussion of aroids'
Subject: Re: [Aroid-l]Philodendron variifolium Schott
Dear Steve,
Here is Graf’s illustration entitled P. variifolium in Tropica, 3rdedition. It does not to me appear to be the same as either of the 2 plantsshown in your attachment. In particular, the brownish or reddish colouring ofthe emergent leaf is absent.
John.
From: aroid-l-bounces@gizmoworks.com[mailto:aroid-l-bounces@gizmoworks.com] OnBehalf Of ExoticRainforest
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 200912:13 PM
To: Discussion of aroids
Subject: [Aroid-l] Philodendronvariifolium Schott
Does anyone have acopy of the published description for
K. Krause whichis the correct name for the plant in the photos on this page. The real Philodendron variifolium looks nothinglike the juvenile plant commonly sold on eBay using the name "Philodendronvariifolium". You can see the real Philodendronvariifolium which has an elongated leaf blade on TROPICOShere: http://www.tropicos.org/Name/2103366
so if anyone hasa specimen you'll trade or sell or knows of a source please let me know.
------_=_NextPart_001_01CA6326.CA24AB86----===============4315067123571294652==